All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: ejt@redhat.com, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm: remove pointless comparison
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:28:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC392F.1070804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140107155252.GB7983@redhat.com>

On 01/07/2014 04:52 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07 2014 at  5:39am -0500,
> Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:53:28PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>> Remove pointless comparison in dm_get_from_kobject. The comparison is
>>> always true and the compiler optimizes it out anyway.
>>>gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel
>>> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/md/dm.c |    2 --
>>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-3.13-rc7/drivers/md/dm.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-3.13-rc7.orig/drivers/md/dm.c	2014-01-07 01:28:27.000000000 +0100
>>> +++ linux-3.13-rc7/drivers/md/dm.c	2014-01-07 01:28:39.000000000 +0100
>>> @@ -2922,8 +2922,6 @@ struct mapped_device *dm_get_from_kobjec
>>>  	struct mapped_device *md;
>>>  
>>>  	md = container_of(kobj, struct mapped_device, kobj);
>>> -	if (&md->kobj != kobj)
>>> -		return NULL;
>>
>> What were they trying to check?  The compiler?
>>
> 
> Milan's commit 784aae735d, and the current dm.c code, offers this
> comment above dm_get_from_kobject:
> 
> /*
>  * struct mapped_device should not be exported outside of dm.c
>  * so use this check to verify that kobj is part of md structure
>  */
> 
> I'm lacking the vision to _know_ why the kobject would suddenly be
> outside of the mapped_device without us knowing via code change..
> 
> The check does seem overly cautious/useless (if we remove it the above
> comment should be removed too).

Yes, please remove both :) The check doesn't make sense.

I think it is just relict of some experiments before I committed this simple
embedded sysfs kobj handling (there were always problems like the missing .release
function you are just solving in other thread).

Milan

 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07  3:53 [PATCH] dm: remove pointless comparison Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-07 10:39 ` Joe Thornber
2014-01-07 15:52   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-01-07 17:28     ` Milan Broz [this message]
2014-01-07 18:17       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CC392F.1070804@gmail.com \
    --to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ejt@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.