All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trevor Woerner <trevor.woerner@linaro.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Qt in OE-core
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:27:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC470A.9030302@linaro.org> (raw)

Hello everyone,

question:
Should some version of Qt be included in openembedded-core, or should
all recipes to add Qt be part of their own version-specific Qt layer?


background:
openembedded-core[1] used to include recipes for Qt3, but as Qt3 became
old these recipes were replaced with Qt4 and the Qt3 support was broken
out into its own layer[2]. We're now at a point where Qt4 is getting old
and Qt5 is "current". At some point we'll have to replace the Qt4
support in [1] with support for Qt5. But we expect users will still want
to use Qt4, so if the Qt4 support in [1] is replaced by support for Qt5,
the Qt4 support will need to be broken out into its own layer. Qt5
support is currently being developed on it's own layer[3].


This email thread is *not* to discuss when we should replace Qt4 with
Qt5, then question is: should [1] include *any* Qt support, or should Qt
be always in its own layer to be added as required by the distribution?


If we decide [1] should provide some Qt support, then we can discuss
when we should replace the Qt4 support with Qt5 in [1]. But for now it
would be nice to reach a consensus on whether or not [1] should include
any Qt support at all or if it wouldn't just be easier to always have Qt
support in its own version-specific layers to be added as required (if
needed) by the distribution configuration.


Thanks for your feedback.



[1]
http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/openembedded-core/
[2] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-qt3/
[3] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-qt5/


             reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 18:27 Trevor Woerner [this message]
2014-01-07 19:23 ` Qt in OE-core Martin Jansa
2014-01-08 10:28   ` Richard Purdie
2014-01-09 14:21     ` Trevor Woerner
2014-01-08 12:05   ` Otavio Salvador
2014-01-08 15:56 ` Paul Eggleton
2014-01-08 16:29   ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-08 18:44   ` Trevor Woerner
2014-01-08 19:39     ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-08 23:21     ` Paul Eggleton
2014-01-08 23:57       ` Richard Purdie
2014-01-09  0:06         ` Philip Balister
2014-01-09  0:32       ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-09  6:32         ` Koen Kooi
2014-01-09 12:57           ` Otavio Salvador
2014-01-09 12:56         ` Otavio Salvador
2014-01-09 15:17         ` Phil Blundell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CC470A.9030302@linaro.org \
    --to=trevor.woerner@linaro.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.