All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@6wind.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/13] vti4: prepare namespace and interfamily support.
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:45:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC594D.3030408@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CC2714.5080600@6wind.com>

Le 07/01/2014 17:11, Christophe Gouault a écrit :
> On 12/16/2013 10:18 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> This patchset prepares vti4 for proper namespace and interfamily support.
>>
>> Currently the receive hook is in the middle of the decapsulation
>> process, some of the header pointers point still into the IPsec packet
>> others point already into the decapsulated packet. This makes it
>> very unflexible and proper namespace and interfamily support can't
>> be done as it is.
>>
>> The patchset that implements an IPsec protocol multiplexer, so that vti
>> can register it's own receive path hooks. Further it makes the i_key
>> usable for vti and changes the vti4 code to do the following:
>>
>> vti uses the IPsec protocol multiplexer to register it's
>> own receive side hooks for ESP, AH and IPCOMP.
>>
>> Vti does the following on receive side:
>>
>> 1. Do an input policy check for the IPsec packet we received.
>>     This is required because this packet could be already
>>     processed by IPsec (tunnel in tunnel or a block policy
>>     is present), so an inbound policy check is needed.
>>
>> 2. Clean the skb to not leak informations on namespace
>>     transitions.
>>
>> 3. Mark the packet with the i_key. The policy and the state
>>     must match this key now. Policy and state belong to the vti
>>     namespace and policy enforcement is done at the further layers.
>>
>> 4. Call the generic xfrm layer to do decryption and decapsulation.
>>
>> 5. Wait for a callback from the xfrm layer to properly update
>>     the device statistics.
>
> Sorry for my late comments, I had to delay my tests due to Christmas and
> New Year's celebrations.
>
> I have a few comments about your proposed patches:
>
> In input, the vti tunnel processing does not follow the usual tunnel
> processing. Conventionally, the packets are first decapsulated, then
> only the skbuff interface is changed to the tunnel interface. In the vti
> code, the interface is changed before IPsec decryption, hence before
> decapsulation.
>
> It results in a configuration asymmetry when we later support cross
> netns: the outer SAs and SPs must be defined in the outer netns, while
> the inner SAs and SPs must be defined in the inner netns. This is a
> little disturbing.
>
>> On transmit side:
>>
>> 1. Mark the packet with the o_key. The policy and the state
>>     must match this key now.
>>
>> 2. Do a xfrm_lookup on the original packet with the mark applied.
>>
>> 3. Check if we got an IPsec route.
>>
>> 4. Clean the skb to not leak informations on namespace
>>     transitions.
>>
>> 5. Attach the dst_enty we got from the xfrm_lookup to the skb.
>>
>> 6. Call dst_output to do the IPsec processing.
>>
>> 7. Do the device statistics.
>
> In output, when the route points to a vti interface, the global SPD
> lookup is not bypassed: an SPD lookup is still performed for a global
> SPD (i.e. without applying the vti mark). Then only the packet can enter
> the vti interface, in which a second SPD lookup is done, in the vti
> interface SPD (i.e. after applying the vti mark). Of course if the
> global SPD lookup returned a tunnel mode policy, then the packet may
> finally not enter the vti interface, because a new route is looked up
> after the IPsec encapsulation.
>
> My understanding of the vti interface interest is enabling to use
> routing (possibly dynamic routes) *instead* of complex security
> policies. And in this use case I expect that entering a vti interface
> will *override* the global policies (in the same manner as socket
> policies override the global policies).
>
> Otherwise, if we want to mix global and vti policies on the same
> machine, then we must carefully define global policies that do not match
> traffic destined to vti interfaces.
>
> Note that setting the NOXFRM flag on the vti interface does not work
> around this issue, it disables both the global and vti SPD lookup and
> the traffic is finally dropped.

I finally found a way of bypassing the global SPD lookup, by explicitly 
adding a global policy of higher priority than other global policies:

# bypass outbound SPD lookup if packet is destined to vti1
ip xfrm policy add dir out dev vti1 mark 0 priority 0 allow

>> Changes from v1:
>>
>> - Rebased to current net-next.
>> - Fix a rcu lockdep complaint in xfrm protocol
>> registration/deregistration.
>> - Fix usage of a ipv4 specific callback handler in generic code.
>> - Use skb_scrub_packet() to clear the skb in vti_rcv(), suggested by
>>    Nicolas Dichtel.
>> - Add support for IPCOMP.
>> - Support inter address family tunneling.
>>
>> I'd take this into the ipsec-next tree after some testing if noone
>> has further suggestions or objections.
>>
>> I have the ipv6 side ready too, this will be a separate patchset.
>> The ipv6 patchset has dependencies against the ipv4 patchset, so I
>> hold it back until we have got the ipv4 side merged.
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-16  9:18 [PATCH RFC v2 0/13] vti4: prepare namespace and interfamily support Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:19 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/13] xfrm4: Add IPsec protocol multiplexer Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:19 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] esp4: Use the IPsec protocol multiplexer API Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/13] esp4: Export esp4_err Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:21 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/13] ah4: Use the IPsec protocol multiplexer API Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:21 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/13] ah4: Export ah4_err Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/13] ipcomp4: Use the IPsec protocol multiplexer API Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:23 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/13] ipcomp4: Export ipcomp4_err Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:23 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/13] xfrm: Add xfrm_tunnel_skb_cb to the skb common buffer Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16 12:54   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2013-12-16 13:02     ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:24 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/13] ip_tunnel: Make vti work with i_key set Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/13] vti: Update the ipv4 side to use it's own receive hook Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:26 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/13] xfrm4: Remove xfrm_tunnel_notifier Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:27 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/13] vti4: Use the on xfrm_lookup returned dst_entry directly Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16  9:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/13] vti4: Support inter address family tunneling Steffen Klassert
2014-01-07 16:11 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/13] vti4: prepare namespace and interfamily support Christophe Gouault
2014-01-07 19:45   ` Christophe Gouault [this message]
2014-01-14  7:51   ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CC594D.3030408@6wind.com \
    --to=christophe.gouault@6wind.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.