From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: "pali.rohar@gmail.com" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OMAPDSS: DISPC: horizontal timing too tight errors
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 22:25:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC62B7.3030004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CBF476.3070306@ti.com>
On 07.01.2014 14:35, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2014-01-06 11:43, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> commit 7faa92339bbb1e6b9a80983b206642517327eb75 "OMAPDSS: DISPC: Handle
>> synclost errors in OMAP3" introduces some limits check to prevent
>> SYNCLOST errors on OMAP3 in a specific usecase. The problem I see here
>> (on Nokia N900, Maemo 5, linux 3.13-rc6, DSP accel video decoding) is
>> that those checks effectively prevent fullscreen video playback of
>> anything above lets say 640x350 with "horizontal timing too tight"
>> errors spit in dmesg log. If I hack check_horiz_timing_omap3 function to
>> always return true, I can happily play videos up to (and including) 720p
>> resolutions, with no SYNCLOST errors.
>
> I never worked with the patch in question, but my understanding is that
> the core issue is quite difficult to solve optimally for all cases.
> There are so many variables involved. So it may well be that the patch
> in question does it a bit over-safely. Then again, it might as well have
> a bug =).
>
> One option is also to increase the blanking timings and pixel clock,
> presuming the panel is fine with it. That would allow some more time for
> the DISPC to manage scaling.
>
> So are you saying that you can't even play any video in the LCD's native
> resolution (i.e. no scaling needed) with fullscreen?
>
>> So, a couple of questions:
>>
>> Where do the values in static const u8 limits[3] come from? Are those
>> documented somewhere?
>
> If I remember right, these horizontal check timings information came
> from some non-public TI guides. Not from the TRM.
>
>> Commit message says "This code is written based on code written by Ville
>> Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@nokia.com> in Linux OMAP kernel.", is that code
>> publicly available and where (if it is).
>
> It should be in the Nokia's kernel for N9.
>
>> Besides compiling DSS driver with DEBUG enabled and providing the log
>> (yeah, I know I should've done it already and have the logs included in
>> this mail, but... :) ), is there anything else I can do to find the
>> culprit for those errors.
>
> You could look at the original patch in the Nokia kernel to see if the
> mainline version is ok. Or maybe even better, try the same use case on
> Nokia's kernel to see if it works.
>
> Tomi
>
>
Ok, after looking at what both N900 and N9 Nokia kernels do, I came up
with the patch bellow. If you are ok with the changes, I'll submit the
patch as it should. With that patch I tried more than 20 videos of
different resolutions(including 720p), not a single failure :) .
Basically it changes the core clock calculation to be done in the same
way as in the Nokia kernels.
Regards,
Ivo
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
index 67e413e..ab5aa05 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
@@ -1999,7 +1999,8 @@ static void calc_tiler_rotation_offset(u16
screen_width, u16 width,
*/
static int check_horiz_timing_omap3(unsigned long pclk, unsigned long
lclk,
const struct omap_video_timings *t, u16 pos_x,
- u16 width, u16 height, u16 out_width, u16 out_height)
+ u16 width, u16 height, u16 out_width, u16 out_height,
+ bool five_taps)
{
const int ds = DIV_ROUND_UP(height, out_height);
unsigned long nonactive;
@@ -2019,6 +2020,10 @@ static int check_horiz_timing_omap3(unsigned long
pclk, unsigned long lclk,
if (blank <= limits[i])
return -EINVAL;
+ /* FIXME add checks for 3-tap filter once the limitations are known */
+ if (!five_taps)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Pixel data should be prepared before visible display point starts.
* So, atleast DS-2 lines must have already been fetched by DISPC
@@ -2191,24 +2196,33 @@ static int dispc_ovl_calc_scaling_34xx(unsigned
long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
const int maxsinglelinewidth =
dss_feat_get_param_max(FEAT_PARAM_LINEWIDTH);
+ *five_taps = height > out_height;
+
do {
in_height = DIV_ROUND_UP(height, *decim_y);
in_width = DIV_ROUND_UP(width, *decim_x);
- *core_clk = calc_core_clk_five_taps(pclk, mgr_timings,
- in_width, in_height, out_width, out_height, color_mode);
-
- error = check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings,
- pos_x, in_width, in_height, out_width,
- out_height);
if (in_width > maxsinglelinewidth)
if (in_height > out_height &&
in_height < out_height * 2)
*five_taps = false;
- if (!*five_taps)
+again:
+ if(*five_taps)
+ *core_clk = calc_core_clk_five_taps(pclk, mgr_timings,
+ in_width, in_height, out_width,
+ out_height, color_mode);
+ else
*core_clk = dispc.feat->calc_core_clk(pclk, in_width,
- in_height, out_width, out_height,
- mem_to_mem);
+ in_height, out_width, out_height,
+ mem_to_mem);
+
+ error = check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings,
+ pos_x, in_width, in_height, out_width,
+ out_height, *five_taps);
+ if(*five_taps && error) {
+ *five_taps = false;
+ goto again;
+ }
error = (error || in_width > maxsinglelinewidth * 2 ||
(in_width > maxsinglelinewidth && *five_taps) ||
@@ -2226,7 +2240,7 @@ static int dispc_ovl_calc_scaling_34xx(unsigned
long pclk, unsigned long lclk,
} while (*decim_x <= *x_predecim && *decim_y <= *y_predecim && error);
if (check_horiz_timing_omap3(pclk, lclk, mgr_timings, pos_x, width,
- height, out_width, out_height)){
+ height, out_width, out_height, *five_taps)){
DSSERR("horizontal timing too tight\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-06 9:43 OMAPDSS: DISPC: horizontal timing too tight errors Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-07 12:35 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-07 18:05 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-07 18:30 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-07 20:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov [this message]
2014-01-07 21:28 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-08 14:03 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CC62B7.3030004@gmail.com \
--to=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.