From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] Add Emacs local variables to source
 files.
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 01:27:54 +0000
Message-ID: <52CCA99A.3080709@citrix.com>
References: <1389140748-26524-1-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>	<1389140748-26524-2-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>
	<20140107171602.1f9d8153@mantra.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140107171602.1f9d8153@mantra.us.oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/01/2014 01:16, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Tue,  7 Jan 2014 19:25:44 -0500
> Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com> wrote:
>
>> These 2 files are changed in this patch set.  So add the allowed
>> "Emacs local variables" from CODING_STYLE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
> Will let some emacs user ack these... "vim" rules!!
>
> Mukesh

Wasn't there a patch a little while back to add equivalent vim rules to
each of the files (or at least a thread suggesting a patch)?  In the
interest of cooperation, it is only fair.

As a fellow emacsian,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

As for 4.4-ness:  If the rest of the series is deemed ok for a
release-ack, then this should go in for completeness.  If part of the
series is decided to be deferred, then this warrants deferring as well.

~Andrew