From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: omap-usb-host: Update DT clock binding information Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:18:45 +0530 Message-ID: <52CD3B1D.5080203@ti.com> References: <1389161742-10533-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <3761842.HRY1CDBF4z@wuerfel> <52CD324D.3020701@ti.com> <201401081235.40927.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201401081235.40927.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Sebastian Reichel , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Samuel Ortiz , tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, "Kristo, Tero" , bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Lee Jones List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 01/08/2014 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2014, Roger Quadros wrote: >> OK. I'll update the binding information to reflect all the clocks. >> >> But what about clk_get() vs of_clk_get_by_name() ? > > I think the convention these days is to just use clk_get(), which calls > of_clk_get_by_name() internally. Not sure if that's what you are asking. > OK fine. I'll continue to use clk_get() then. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:18:45 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: omap-usb-host: Update DT clock binding information In-Reply-To: <201401081235.40927.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1389161742-10533-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <3761842.HRY1CDBF4z@wuerfel> <52CD324D.3020701@ti.com> <201401081235.40927.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <52CD3B1D.5080203@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/08/2014 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2014, Roger Quadros wrote: >> OK. I'll update the binding information to reflect all the clocks. >> >> But what about clk_get() vs of_clk_get_by_name() ? > > I think the convention these days is to just use clk_get(), which calls > of_clk_get_by_name() internally. Not sure if that's what you are asking. > OK fine. I'll continue to use clk_get() then. cheers, -roger From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755666AbaAHLtd (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 06:49:33 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:50657 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754960AbaAHLtc (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 06:49:32 -0500 Message-ID: <52CD3B1D.5080203@ti.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:18:45 +0530 From: Roger Quadros User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann , CC: Sebastian Reichel , , Samuel Ortiz , , , , , "Kristo, Tero" , , , Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: omap-usb-host: Update DT clock binding information References: <1389161742-10533-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <3761842.HRY1CDBF4z@wuerfel> <52CD324D.3020701@ti.com> <201401081235.40927.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201401081235.40927.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/08/2014 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2014, Roger Quadros wrote: >> OK. I'll update the binding information to reflect all the clocks. >> >> But what about clk_get() vs of_clk_get_by_name() ? > > I think the convention these days is to just use clk_get(), which calls > of_clk_get_by_name() internally. Not sure if that's what you are asking. > OK fine. I'll continue to use clk_get() then. cheers, -roger