From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] ptrace: Fix build problems with glibc-2.18
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:50:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CD3B93.8090605@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401060749.29230.vapier@gentoo.org>
On 01/06/2014 12:49 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 06:45:43 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/05/2014 10:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Monday 25 November 2013 05:12:59 Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Since glibc-2.18, the struct ptrace_peeksiginfo_args is
>>>> also defined in sys/ptrace.h and conflicts with the definition
>>>> from the Linux kernel in linux/ptrace.h. We fix this by not
>>>> including the linux/ptrace.h header if the sys/ptrace.h header
>>>> defines the said struct. Fixes
>>>> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/6
>>>
>>> i'm somewhat inclined to undo this as it's really a bug in glibc-2.18
>>> that should be fixed in glibc-2.19:
>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-01/msg00078.html
>>
>> Ehm that would break the build for people already using 2.18. Even if a
>> new 2.18 is released with the fix, people using the old one will still
>> face the same problem.
>
> i'm aware that would be the situation. i'm fine with that.
> -mike
>
It's not my call to make, but forcing people to update their glibc in
order to build LTP is a bit too much. I suggest to keep this workaround
for X months, until more people have been moved to a fixed glibc version.
strace also has similar fix
http://sourceforge.net/p/strace/code/ci/0b4060f61f1bb101b5d8d084714b7d2feacdb199/
other projects may have one too. Such fixes keep systems with 2.18
working for now and it really does not affect anyone with <2.18.
but like I said, it not really my call to make. whatever works for you.
--
markos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 10:12 [LTP] [PATCH v2] ptrace: Fix build problems with glibc-2.18 Markos Chandras
2013-12-02 9:31 ` Markos Chandras
2013-12-02 17:35 ` chrubis
2013-12-02 17:52 ` chrubis
2014-01-05 22:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-06 11:45 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-06 12:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-08 11:50 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-01-08 19:41 ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-08 15:22 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <201401081442.11349.vapier@gentoo.org>
2014-01-09 11:58 ` chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CD3B93.8090605@imgtec.com \
--to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.