From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:54:50 +0100 Message-ID: <52CD4A9A.4010205@atmel.com> References: <1383816355-2956-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:22203 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751764AbaAHMyx (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 07:54:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Victor , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Jakub Pavelek On 08/01/2014 13:42, Linus Walleij : > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin >> on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the >> AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on >> compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the >> platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform >> data. >> >> This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO >> implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward >> multiplatform. >> >> The patch also adds device tree support for getting the >> RTS GPIO pin from the device tree on DT boot paths. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij >> --- >> ChangeLog v3->v4: > > Hi Nicolas, I don't see this patch in linux-next, where did it > get stuck? Something I can help with? Greg has ACKed it > and all I think ... Yes, everything seemed ready. It is actually stuck in Uwe's pull-request which I asked for an update yesterday... (Re: [GIT PULL] get rid of ). Maybe we should synchronize each other on IRC? I would have liked to see it merged in linux-next soon. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:54:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib In-Reply-To: References: <1383816355-2956-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Message-ID: <52CD4A9A.4010205@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/01/2014 13:42, Linus Walleij : > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin >> on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the >> AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on >> compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the >> platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform >> data. >> >> This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO >> implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward >> multiplatform. >> >> The patch also adds device tree support for getting the >> RTS GPIO pin from the device tree on DT boot paths. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij >> --- >> ChangeLog v3->v4: > > Hi Nicolas, I don't see this patch in linux-next, where did it > get stuck? Something I can help with? Greg has ACKed it > and all I think ... Yes, everything seemed ready. It is actually stuck in Uwe's pull-request which I asked for an update yesterday... (Re: [GIT PULL] get rid of ). Maybe we should synchronize each other on IRC? I would have liked to see it merged in linux-next soon. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre