All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: <wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com>, <greg@kroah.com>,
	<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: check passed socket's net matches NFSd superblock's one
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:15:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CE4C7E.1030801@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103222226.GD5164@fieldses.org>

04.01.2014 02:22, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> There could be a case, when NFSd file system is mounted in network, different
>> to socket's one, like below:
>>
>> "ip netns exec" creates new network and mount namespace, which duplicates NFSd
>> mount point, created in init_net context. And thus NFS server stop in nested
>> network context leads to RPCBIND client destruction in init_net.
>> Then, on NFSd start in nested network context, rpc.nfsd process creates socket
>> in nested net and passes it into "write_ports", which leads to RPCBIND sockets
>> creation in init_net context because of the same reason (NFSd monut point was
>> created in init_net context). An attempt to register passed socket in nested
>> net leads to panic, because no RPCBIND client present in nexted network
>> namespace.
>
> So it's the attempt to use a NULL ->rpcb_local_clnt4?
>

Correct.

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-09  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30 14:23 [PATCH] nfsd: check passed socket's net matches NFSd superblock's one Stanislav Kinsbursky
2014-01-03 22:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-09  7:15   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2014-02-15  1:51   ` Weng Meiling
2014-02-17 22:19     ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-18 13:06       ` Weng Meiling
2014-02-18 15:19       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2014-02-18 15:44         ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-19 10:26           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2014-02-19 14:50             ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-19 14:57               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2014-02-20 21:31                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-02-21  9:18                   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-26 13:50 Stanislav Kinsbursky
2014-03-31 20:58 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CE4C7E.1030801@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.