From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [216.168.135.167]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A183600AC for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4821 invoked by uid 1003); 10 Jan 2014 01:14:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.254.26?) (philip@opensdr.com@74.47.80.243) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Jan 2014 01:14:44 -0000 Message-ID: <52CF4983.4070501@balister.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:14:43 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trevor Woerner References: <52CEEE43.1090209@linaro.org> <52CF2625.5030407@windriver.com> <52CF2ED0.8090605@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <52CF2ED0.8090605@linaro.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: unmaintained layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:14:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/09/2014 06:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner >>> wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here >>>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it >>>> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are >>>> suspected of being, unmaintained? >>> >>> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity >>> ? Versus an >>> opt-in query ? >> >> I agree.. see below for mine.. > > To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought > were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this > way works too. > > Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, > according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle > meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me > suspect it was abandoned. This approach is a good test of which layer maintainers are paying attention to list traffic :) Philip > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >