From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:56:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CFD1ED.7010302@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3767 bytes --]
On 2014-01-05 15:13, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
>
> Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
> unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
> acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
> that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
> acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable
>
I think this is just getting more messy. How about we more or less revert the c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 and fix it like this:
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index 714ee92dfb9f..8e97d06921ff 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -346,28 +346,22 @@ static int acx565akm_get_actual_brightness(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
static int acx565akm_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *dev)
{
struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
- int r;
int level;
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
if (dev->props.fb_blank == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK &&
dev->props.power == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK)
level = dev->props.brightness;
else
level = 0;
- r = 0;
if (ddata->has_bc)
acx565akm_set_brightness(ddata, level);
else
- r = -ENODEV;
-
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+ return -ENODEV;
- return r;
+ return 0;
}
static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
@@ -390,9 +384,33 @@ static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static int acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_update_status(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
static const struct backlight_ops acx565akm_bl_ops = {
- .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity,
- .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status,
+ .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked,
+ .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked,
};
/*--------------------Auto Brightness control via Sysfs---------------------*/
@@ -526,8 +544,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
int r;
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
in->ops.sdi->set_timings(in, &ddata->videomode);
@@ -568,8 +584,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
set_display_state(ddata, 1);
set_cabc_mode(ddata, ddata->cabc_mode);
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
-
return acx565akm_bl_update_status(ddata->bl_dev);
}
@@ -605,6 +619,7 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
int r;
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -615,7 +630,9 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
if (omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
return 0;
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
r = acx565akm_panel_power_on(dssdev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
if (r)
return r;
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CFD1ED.7010302@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3767 bytes --]
On 2014-01-05 15:13, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
>
> Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
> unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
> acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
> that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
> acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable
>
I think this is just getting more messy. How about we more or less revert the c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 and fix it like this:
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index 714ee92dfb9f..8e97d06921ff 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -346,28 +346,22 @@ static int acx565akm_get_actual_brightness(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
static int acx565akm_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *dev)
{
struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
- int r;
int level;
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
if (dev->props.fb_blank == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK &&
dev->props.power == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK)
level = dev->props.brightness;
else
level = 0;
- r = 0;
if (ddata->has_bc)
acx565akm_set_brightness(ddata, level);
else
- r = -ENODEV;
-
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+ return -ENODEV;
- return r;
+ return 0;
}
static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
@@ -390,9 +384,33 @@ static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static int acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_update_status(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
static const struct backlight_ops acx565akm_bl_ops = {
- .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity,
- .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status,
+ .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked,
+ .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked,
};
/*--------------------Auto Brightness control via Sysfs---------------------*/
@@ -526,8 +544,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
int r;
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
in->ops.sdi->set_timings(in, &ddata->videomode);
@@ -568,8 +584,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
set_display_state(ddata, 1);
set_cabc_mode(ddata, ddata->cabc_mode);
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
-
return acx565akm_bl_update_status(ddata->bl_dev);
}
@@ -605,6 +619,7 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
int r;
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -615,7 +630,9 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
if (omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
return 0;
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
r = acx565akm_panel_power_on(dssdev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
if (r)
return r;
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Cc: <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, <pali.rohar@gmail.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CFD1ED.7010302@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3767 bytes --]
On 2014-01-05 15:13, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
>
> Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
> unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
> acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
> that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
> acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable
>
I think this is just getting more messy. How about we more or less revert the c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 and fix it like this:
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index 714ee92dfb9f..8e97d06921ff 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -346,28 +346,22 @@ static int acx565akm_get_actual_brightness(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
static int acx565akm_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *dev)
{
struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
- int r;
int level;
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
if (dev->props.fb_blank == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK &&
dev->props.power == FB_BLANK_UNBLANK)
level = dev->props.brightness;
else
level = 0;
- r = 0;
if (ddata->has_bc)
acx565akm_set_brightness(ddata, level);
else
- r = -ENODEV;
-
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+ return -ENODEV;
- return r;
+ return 0;
}
static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
@@ -390,9 +384,33 @@ static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static int acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_update_status(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked(struct backlight_device *dev)
+{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+ int r;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+ r = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity(dev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
static const struct backlight_ops acx565akm_bl_ops = {
- .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity,
- .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status,
+ .get_brightness = acx565akm_bl_get_intensity_locked,
+ .update_status = acx565akm_bl_update_status_locked,
};
/*--------------------Auto Brightness control via Sysfs---------------------*/
@@ -526,8 +544,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
int r;
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
-
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
in->ops.sdi->set_timings(in, &ddata->videomode);
@@ -568,8 +584,6 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
set_display_state(ddata, 1);
set_cabc_mode(ddata, ddata->cabc_mode);
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
-
return acx565akm_bl_update_status(ddata->bl_dev);
}
@@ -605,6 +619,7 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
{
+ struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
int r;
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -615,7 +630,9 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
if (omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
return 0;
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
r = acx565akm_panel_power_on(dssdev);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
if (r)
return r;
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 21:24 [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-06 21:24 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 18:37 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-11 18:37 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-12-06 12:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing unlock in acx565akm_panel_power_on() Wei Yongjun
2013-12-06 12:55 ` Wei Yongjun
2013-12-11 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-12-11 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-12-30 16:17 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov
2013-12-30 16:17 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-05 12:58 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 12:58 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 13:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 13:13 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-11 9:39 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-11 9:39 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-25 13:29 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2015-12-25 13:29 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2016-01-01 12:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2016-01-01 12:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CFD1ED.7010302@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.