From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: REQ_PM vs REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:29:04 -0500 Message-ID: <52D003B0.6080101@ubuntu.com> References: <52CC1FF2.1020301@ubuntu.com> <52CEEAA1.2010904@interlog.com> <52CEF68C.40703@ubuntu.com> <52CF83B7.90409@interlog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:47780 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbaAJO3K (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:29:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52CF83B7.90409@interlog.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: dgilbert@interlog.com, Alan Stern Cc: Aaron Lu , Sujit Reddy Thumma , todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com, tj@kernel.org, JBottomley@parallels.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/10/2014 12:23 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > It is a command in the "Sense Data Reporting feature set" which is > optional for ATA devices and "P" as in "Prohibited" for ATAPI > devices. See the Feature set summary table. Oops, you're right. > You had me fooled: I thought you had some knowledge of the ATA > command set. Thanks for proving me wrong. No need to be a complete dick. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS0AOvAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwxMkH/0cszltV/h/7tRXuCAJSp8EM Z/BlrNLFUaKrTZMLt16bJBI+xhr2RbhBl9alyMWHoQI0NTEQyZ4RcClK+ByElzVh aq5FI19an16RcYroTnU2EbJQ/bbH9P0gyz7JV/sNHAkMrM+pPZnQS/rx40fAYlnA kWGgXESJMMr4oSGEwQku+1kUmh1SIYHyU2fa6domOlGoPdNQMt69HyiqBGyjEQ1/ Ms9hF7w2xW0bxN9fH68wu2YnQ9NIgZDYCXpmutxGzANNkGEsvs62u51X1d+CWAwB 8inOe7JTONk5r0g12XFjOnWvsnH0FplVI6fQlggchhuETP/WVXAXUY7shfeJ23w= =6cKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----