From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dbg_rw_guest_mem: Conditionally
 enable debug log output
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:15:42 -0500
Message-ID: <52D062FE.5000803@terremark.com>
References: <1389140748-26524-1-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>
	<1389140748-26524-4-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com>
	<1389177510.4883.11.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<52CD60AA.9010607@terremark.com>
	<1389199626.4883.112.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<20140108170442.GA75747@deinos.phlegethon.org>
	<1389203062.27473.8.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<20140108163822.30b6f87a@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<1389261548.27473.42.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
	<52CEC978.7040705@terremark.com>
	<52CEDCD30200007800112096@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<52CEE2E2.2030501@terremark.com>
	<1389373999.6423.42.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1389373999.6423.42.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/10/14 12:13, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:56 -0500, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 01/09/14 11:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 09.01.14 at 17:08, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com> wrote:
>>>> Based on Mukesh's statement, attached is the rebased version of this patch
>>>> (labeled v3).  I included Mukesh's ack.
>>> Unless this is meant just for reviewing purposes (albeit even then
>>> it's likely problematic), could you please get used to sending
>>> patch revisions with mail subjects (i.e. not retaining the prior
>>> version indicator), so there is a reasonable chance to reconstruct
>>> things by searching just the titles in a mail archive. (It's still fine -
>>> at least as far as I'm concerned - to reply to an earlier version,
>>> thus tying things into a single thread on the archive.)
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>> I will try to.  I had not noticed this in the past.
> Thanks, as Jan says it is very confusing.
>
> If there are tools things outstanding in this series which should be for
> 4.4 then I don't know what is where or what has been acked.
>
> Please can resend whatever you think is outstanding for 4.4 as a fresh
> thread with a suitable vN larger than any of the ones mentioned in any
> of the replies here and with the acks collected.
>
> Ian.
>
Will do.  I expect ~1 hour to rebase, build and quick test.

    -Don