From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Aruna-Hewapathirane <aruna.hewapathirane@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: replace macros net_random and net_srandom with direct calls to prandom
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:52:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D192FD.90606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140111180025.GB6586@order.stressinduktion.org>
On 01/11/2014 07:00 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 09:52:37AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 07:15 -0500, Aruna-Hewapathirane wrote:
>>> This patch removes the net_random and net_srandom macros and replaces
>>> them with direct calls to the prandom ones. As new commits only seem to
>>> use prandom_u32 there is no use to keep them around.
>>> This change makes it easier to grep for users of prandom_u32.
>>
>> Seems sensible.
>>
>> Also, there may be some value in a future patch
>> to use reciprocal_divide in a few places
>>
>>> diff --git a/net/802/garp.c b/net/802/garp.c
>>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void garp_join_timer_arm(struct garp_applicant *app)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long delay;
>>>
>>> - delay = (u64)msecs_to_jiffies(garp_join_time) * net_random() >> 32;
>>> + delay = (u64)msecs_to_jiffies(garp_join_time) * prandom_u32() >> 32;
>>
>> reciprocal_divide()
>
> Does reciprocal_divide() make sense without reciprocal_value() from a
> stylish point of view?
No. ;-)
There was already some work, but I didn't have time to finish it:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg249395.html
Maybe it's time that we should revisit that.
> I wouldn't do that just because it expands into the same code.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-11 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-11 12:15 [PATCH net-next] net: replace macros net_random and net_srandom with direct calls to prandom Aruna-Hewapathirane
2014-01-11 12:21 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-01-11 17:52 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-11 18:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-01-11 18:43 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-11 18:58 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-01-11 18:52 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-01-11 19:20 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-11 19:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-01-14 23:15 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D192FD.90606@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=aruna.hewapathirane@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.