All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <52D1FB94.1030006@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 86b4748..9c733d8 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -112,18 +112,18 @@ inside clock ops.
 >>>>> +
 >>>>
 >>>> What do you think about adding those parameters (like CPU dividers)
->>>> as an attribute to /cpus/cpu@0 node?
+>>>> as an attribute to /cpus/cpu at 0 node?
 >>>
 >>> Not in CPU node but may be in clock controller node since these values
 >>> are actually used by the clock controller.
 >>
->> /cpus/cpu@0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are
+>> /cpus/cpu at 0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are
 >> related to core)
 >
 > DIVs belong to the clock controller, not the CPU, and are addressed
 > from the clock controller address space.
 
-I also think that the contents of cpu@0 node should be limited only to 
+I also think that the contents of cpu at 0 node should be limited only to 
 CPU specific data. Personally I don't even like the idea of having 
 operating points there - I would rather see frequency limits there, i.e. 
 maximum frequency allowed at given voltage; specific frequency values 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 96e843f..5e9d903 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,21 +4,10 @@
  "ref\0CAJuA9aidWvkPPXFfOysqQCQ4d7q_y51zbYxHCK9d-E8+ojfN_w@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\020140110151812.5104cc92@amdc2363\0"
  "ref\0CAJuA9aj3ca9VNsQ9cadVH8pUpyYeaht3DufT3DW4jXuEN5BudA@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: register cpu clock provider for exynos4210 SoC\0"
+ "From\0tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: register cpu clock provider for exynos4210 SoC\0"
  "Date\0Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:19:00 +0100\0"
- "To\0Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>"
- " Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
-  cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
-  devicetree@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  t.figa@samsung.com
-  kgene.kim@samsung.com
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
-  thomas.ab@samsung.com
- " Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 11.01.2014 06:25, Thomas Abraham wrote:\n"
@@ -135,18 +124,18 @@
  ">>>>> +\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> What do you think about adding those parameters (like CPU dividers)\n"
- ">>>> as an attribute to /cpus/cpu@0 node?\n"
+ ">>>> as an attribute to /cpus/cpu at 0 node?\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> Not in CPU node but may be in clock controller node since these values\n"
  ">>> are actually used by the clock controller.\n"
  ">>\n"
- ">> /cpus/cpu@0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are\n"
+ ">> /cpus/cpu at 0 seems like a good place for them (since those DIVs are\n"
  ">> related to core)\n"
  ">\n"
  "> DIVs belong to the clock controller, not the CPU, and are addressed\n"
  "> from the clock controller address space.\n"
  "\n"
- "I also think that the contents of cpu@0 node should be limited only to \n"
+ "I also think that the contents of cpu at 0 node should be limited only to \n"
  "CPU specific data. Personally I don't even like the idea of having \n"
  "operating points there - I would rather see frequency limits there, i.e. \n"
  "maximum frequency allowed at given voltage; specific frequency values \n"
@@ -386,4 +375,4 @@
  "Best regards,\n"
  Tomasz
 
-89ebd117365186972ee5d3ace6ed0e5572bc838496c5d7e277e6f18c048ff8d4
+566dcaa5494b850e31cebb5d642492f4017e6af5c536a9745fb180f51d9aa9df

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.