From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Williams Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:28:04 -0800 Subject: [U-Boot] XHCI Issues In-Reply-To: <52D49EE7.6060006@caviumnetworks.com> References: <52D49EE7.6060006@caviumnetworks.com> Message-ID: <52D4BCD4.7010908@caviumnetworks.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 01/13/2014 06:20 PM, Aaron Williams wrote: > Hi all, > > I am bringing up XHCI support for our SOC and have run into several > issues with U-Boot's XHCI code. > > 1. I need to use a wrapper I call xhci_readl/xhci_writel since all of > our I/O is to 64-bit addresses rather than readl/writel which work for > PCIe. While xhci_readl/xhci_writel is used in most places there are a > few places this is missing. > > 2. A memory address used by a pointer is not a DMA address on MIPS. On > MIPS a wrapper is needed for all read/write operations to descriptors > to map the addresses. Generally U-Boot runs in KSEG0 where a pointer > always has bit 31 set. In our case we run it in virtual memory with > U-Boot loaded at the top of memory (which might be as high as > 64GB+256MB). > > 3. xhci_alloc_virt_device is missing a conversion from big endian to > little endian on line 401 of xhci-mem.c. > > 4. I keep getting hit with > > BUG_ON(GET_COMP_CODE(le32_to_cpu(event->trans_event.transfer_len > != COMP_STOP))); > on line 491 in xhci-ring.c. Commenting this out seems to work fine. > > 5. I also hit the BUG_ON on line 722 of xhci-ring.c since on MIPS a > pointer is not a DMA address and the fact that we use 64-bit addresses > where pointers are 32-bits. > > I ran into similar issues with EHCI where again we have to map > pointers to physical addresses and use our own wrappers for register > accesses. > > At some point I would love to merge our stuff back into the mainline > U-Boot but it's going to be a huge job given that we probably have > almost 250K lines of code involved for our MIPS SOCs. > > -Aaron > I have a follow-up: I am seeing error messages when hub ports are reset. In the output below I have a USB 3 thumb drive plugged into USB0 and a USB 2 thumb drive plugged into USB1. Each USB device has "2" ports, where port 0 is treated as a USB 3 port and port 1 is treated as a USB 1/2 port. I think the "cannot reset port X!?" message is invalid since otherwise everything appears to be working. I am also seeing rather slow transfers of around 1.9MiB/sec. Is this normal for XHCI? This is for both USB 2 and a high-speed USB 3 thumb drive when loading a 40MiB Linux kernel image. -Aaron -- Aaron Williams Software Engineer Cavium, Inc. (408) 943-7198 (510) 789-8988 (cell)