From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1W2vxQ-0000F8-A2 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: <52D4C1FF.4060909@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:50:07 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Anyone had any luck with 'raw' packet mode? References: <52D44028.8020204@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 01/13/2014 06:03 PM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote: > Is your packet sniffer capture frame on 20MHz, 40MHz or 80MHz? Anyone manage to do on 80MHz? Just HT40, and I'm only trying to use ath10k as stations in /n mode currently. As soon as I can get that working, I'll start on more interesting /ac features. Thanks, Ben > > ----- > Chun-Yeow > > On Jan 14, 2014 3:36 AM, "Ben Greear" > wrote: > > I managed to get raw mode working for receiving packets, > but on transmit, I cannot get any packets actually transmitted > on the air (per my sniffer). > > Anyone know what might be needed to get this working? > > For instance, should we be sending raw frames with frags, > or more like we currently send management frames? > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear > > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k