From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] target: Add DIF CHECK_CONDITION ASC/ASCQ exception cases Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: <52D4EADC.60300@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1389212157-14540-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <1389212157-14540-3-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <52CE7D3F.7030308@mellanox.com> <1389336816.5567.404.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1389336816.5567.404.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: target-devel , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Or Gerlitz List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 1/10/2014 8:53 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:43 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> On 1/8/2014 10:36 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>> From: Nicholas Bellinger >>> >>> This patch adds support for DIF related CHECK_CONDITION ASC/ASCQ >>> exception cases into transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(). >>> >>> This includes: >>> >>> LOGICAL BLOCK GUARD CHECK FAILED >>> LOGICAL BLOCK APPLICATION TAG CHECK FAILED >>> LOGICAL BLOCK REFERENCE TAG CHECK FAILED >>> >>> that used by DIF TYPE1 and TYPE3 failure cases. >>> >>> Cc: Martin K. Petersen >>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig >>> Cc: Hannes Reinecke >>> Cc: Sagi Grimberg >>> Cc: Or Gerlitz >>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger >>> --- >>> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/target/target_core_base.h | 3 +++ >>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c >>> index 91953da..707ee17 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c >>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c >>> @@ -2648,6 +2648,36 @@ transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd, >>> buffer[SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x1d; >>> buffer[SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x00; >>> break; >>> + case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILED: >>> + /* CURRENT ERROR */ >>> + buffer[0] = 0x70; >>> + buffer[SPC_ADD_SENSE_LEN_OFFSET] = 10; >>> + /* ILLEGAL REQUEST */ >>> + buffer[SPC_SENSE_KEY_OFFSET] = ILLEGAL_REQUEST; >>> + /* LOGICAL BLOCK GUARD CHECK FAILED */ >>> + buffer[SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x10; >>> + buffer[SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x01; >> Hey Nic, In my iSER patches I constructed the same sense buffer (call isert_pi_err_sense_buffer) and called isert_put_rsponse. So I should call this routine instead correct?