From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Migration between different bitness toolstacks
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:57:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D55061.2020900@citrix.com> (raw)
Hello,
As part of XenServer's attempt to move to a 64bit dom0, we have
encountered a sizeable flaw in xc_domain_{save,restore}().
Migration of a VM from a 32bit toolstack to a 64bit toolstackfails with:
xc: detail: xc_domain_restore: starting restore of new domid 1
xc: detail: xc_domain_restore: p2m_size = ffffffff00010000
xc: error: Couldn't allocate p2m_frame_list array: Internal error
xc: detail: Restore exit of domid 1 with rc=1
This is caused because of
RDEXACT(io_fd, &dinfo->p2m_size, sizeof(unsigned long))
where sizeof(unsigned long) is different between the source and destination.
It is unreasonable for the format of the migration stream to rely on the
bitness of the toolstack, which should be completely transparent as far
as "motion of a VM" is concerned. Furthermore, the same issue occurs
with suspend/resume where the stream gets written to a file in the meantime.
A quick grep across the code shows several other items in the migration
stream which depend on toolstack bitness.
There is no way to divine whether the far side of the migration stream
is 32 or 64 bit, which is now vital information required to read the
stream correctly.
As a result, it is not obvious how best to fix this with backwards
compatibility in mind.
~Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 14:57 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-01-14 15:27 ` Migration between different bitness toolstacks Ian Campbell
2014-01-14 16:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-14 16:18 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-14 16:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-01-14 16:34 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D55061.2020900@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.