All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: find the latest idle cpu
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:37:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D69D44.4090504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115073533.GU31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 01/15/2014 03:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:07:59PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> Currently we just try to find least load cpu. If some cpus idled,
>> we just pick the first cpu in cpu mask.
>>
>> In fact we can get the interrupted idle cpu or the latest idled cpu,
>> then we may get the benefit from both latency and power.
>> The selected cpu maybe not the best, since other cpu may be interrupted
>> during our selecting. But be captious costs too much.
> 
> No, we should not do anything like this without first integrating
> cpuidle.
> 
> At which point we have a sane view of the idle states and can make a
> sane choice between them.
> 


Daniel,

Any comments to make it better?

-- 
Thanks
    Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-15 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-15  4:07 [RFC PATCH] sched: find the latest idle cpu Alex Shi
2014-01-15  4:31 ` Michael wang
2014-01-15  4:48   ` Alex Shi
2014-01-15  4:53     ` Alex Shi
2014-01-15  5:06       ` Alex Shi
2014-01-15  5:33 ` Michael wang
2014-01-15  6:45   ` Alex Shi
2014-01-15  8:05     ` Michael wang
2014-01-15 14:28       ` Alex Shi
2014-01-15  7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-15 14:37   ` Alex Shi [this message]
2014-01-16 11:03     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-16 11:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-16 12:16         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-17  2:40           ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D69D44.4090504@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.