From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
lkp@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [sched] 73628fba4: +69% context switches
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:02:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D73D9E.8090402@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140116012301.GA2535@localhost>
On 01/16/2014 09:23 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:57:30PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 01/11/2014 06:19 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> FYI, we find much increased interrupts and context switches introduced
>>> by commit 73628fba4 ("sched: unify imbalance bias for target group")
>>> in your noload branch:
>>
>> Many thanks for the generous and quick testing! :)
>>
>> few questions for the results and give a testing patch for try. it also push on github.
>>
>> What's about the aim7 shell_rtns_1 and shared throughput?
>
> The throughputs remain the same. We only report changed numbers.
So many interrupt increase doesn't cause any performance change, that
make more doubt of data correction.
Could you like to give the typical vmstat output? Specially the
sys/us/wa/id time percentages.
BTW
Just confirm, the benchmark is running on a native machine, not a kvm
guest, right?
>>
>> commit c5a8778a132cfa882609fbccb4ee6542eac9866d
>> Author: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
>> Date: Mon Jan 13 13:54:30 2014 +0800
>>
>> more bias towards local cpu group
>
>
> In your rebased tree, there are still much increased interrupts and
> context switches:
>
Thanks for your great testing!
Seems I tune it to the wrong direction. :)
Will change to another directory to reduce the questionable interrupt/CS
increase.
--
Thanks
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-11 10:19 [sched] 73628fba4: +69% context switches Fengguang Wu
2014-01-13 5:57 ` Alex Shi
2014-01-16 1:23 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-01-16 2:02 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2014-01-16 2:18 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-01-16 2:46 ` Alex Shi
2014-01-16 3:01 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-01-16 3:07 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D73D9E.8090402@linaro.org \
--to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.