From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] add support for Hyper-V partition reference time enlightenment Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:53:26 +0100 Message-ID: <52D7E456.1000806@redhat.com> References: <1389691337-12050-1-git-send-email-vrozenfe@redhat.com> <1389691337-12050-3-git-send-email-vrozenfe@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, pl@dlhnet.de To: Vadim Rozenfeld Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]:46262 "EHLO mail-qc0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751271AbaAPNxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:53:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c9so2314329qcz.31 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 05:53:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1389691337-12050-3-git-send-email-vrozenfe@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 14/01/2014 10:22, Vadim Rozenfeld ha scritto: > @@ -1883,6 +1884,13 @@ static int set_msr_hyperv_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data) > addr = gfn_to_hva(kvm, gfn); > if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr)) > return 1; > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) > + && ka->use_master_clock) { > + tsc_ref.tsc_sequence = 1; I think that after the first migration the sequence number will always be 2: set_msr_hyperv_pw will set it to 1, and KVM_SET_KVMCLOCK will increment it. Can you check this? The solution would be to propagate the "struct msr_data *" argument from kvm_set_msr_common to kvm_set_msr_hyper_pw. Then, here in this "if" you can test msr_info->host_initiated, and increment the tsc_sequence instead of resetting. Like if ((!msr_info->host_initiated || tsc_ref.tsc_sequence) && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) && ka->use_master_clock) { tsc_ref.tsc_sequence = msr_info->host_initiated ? tsc_ref.tsc_sequence + 1 : 1; > + tsc_ref.tsc_scale = ((10000LL << 32) / > + vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz) << 32; > + tsc_ref.tsc_offset = kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset; > + } > if (__copy_to_user((void __user *)addr, &tsc_ref, sizeof(tsc_ref))) > return 1; > mark_page_dirty(kvm, gfn); > @@ -3871,6 +3879,27 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > local_irq_enable(); > kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = delta; > kvm_gen_update_masterclock(kvm); > + if (kvm->arch.hv_tsc_page & HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ENABLE) { > + HV_REFERENCE_TSC_PAGE tsc_ref; > + struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch; > + r = kvm_read_guest(kvm, kvm->arch.hv_tsc_page, > + &tsc_ref, sizeof(tsc_ref)); > + if (r) > + goto out; > + if (tsc_ref.tsc_sequence > + && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) > + && ka->use_master_clock) { > + tsc_ref.tsc_sequence++; > + tsc_ref.tsc_scale = ((10000LL << 32) / > + __get_cpu_var(cpu_tsc_khz)) << 32; Since on migration kvm_set_hyperv_pw will always be called, do you need to write tsc_ref.scale at all here? Paolo > + tsc_ref.tsc_offset = kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset; > + } else > + tsc_ref.tsc_sequence = 0; > + r = kvm_write_guest(kvm, kvm->arch.hv_tsc_page, > + &tsc_ref, sizeof(tsc_ref)); > + if (r) > + goto out; > + } > break; > } > case KVM_GET_CLOCK: { >