From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre AUBERT <p.aubert@staubli.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:12:39 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Revert "mx6: soc: Disable VDDPU regulator"
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BgT+gMV2Ow5+ZqymNhEP77MyPg9Rav=h+mj1J7E-kEXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1389877049-17615-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
	<52D7D95F.8040306@denx.de>
	<CAOMZO5Dq5u10ykZyG0vJHYb8nWp95m6d6pw91yvU9EZs+vDa9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP9ODKp3i5C+U0jEMeBdcNpD8RHhRaivO0Aapv3ajhXTri6ifg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMZO5Azz6_H3Jn8G0WTN-SXJrDy-19P+ZM3Z5HS7S=P-CNMkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP9ODKonGYPUqEM77TJA4On+MwLrpT4FZkrWXj-_mTDDbKt4MA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMZO5BgT+gMV2Ow5+ZqymNhEP77MyPg9Rav=h+mj1J7E-kEXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52D804F7.1000100@staubli.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Le 16/01/2014 17:01, Fabio Estevam a ?crit :
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
>>> It worked for you probably because you used the ldo bypass mode.
>>
>> Yes; I did the bypass mode.
> We currently don't do LDO bypass mode in mainline U-boot. We do it in
> FSL U-boot.
>
> With LDO bypass, lower VDDARM and VDDSOC voltages can be supplied as
> per the mx6 datasheet.
>
> I just measured with the scope and the VDDARM/SOC voltages supplied by
> the 3.10 FSL kernel are below the minimum for the LDO enabled case. So
> setting LDO bypass in U-boot 'fixes' the issue.
>
> We can implement LDO bypass after 2014.01 is out, but for this release
> let's just revert the VDDPU disable patch.
>
> Do you agree?
+1
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam