All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@peak-system.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] can fd: Add separate bittiming infrastructure
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:30:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D80912.1090700@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D6CB48.9010206@hartkopp.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 921 bytes --]

On 01/15/2014 06:54 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Introduce a second set of bitrate configuration for the (potential different)
> data bitrate. The CAN FD arbitration bitrate is stored in the existing
> bittiming configuration space.
> 
> TODO:
> The functions can_calc_bittiming(), can_fixup_bittiming() should change their
> parameters from
> 
> 	(struct net_device *dev, struct can_bittiming *bt)
> to
> 	(struct can_bittiming *bt, const struct can_bittiming_const *btc, const struct can_clock *clk)

Are there any netdev_printk()? I don't want to loose the explicit device
information.

Otherwise looks good so far.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 242 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-15 17:54 [PATCH RFC] can fd: Add separate bittiming infrastructure Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-16 16:30 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2014-01-17  7:44 ` Stephane Grosjean
2014-01-18 17:34   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21  8:42     ` Stephane Grosjean
2014-01-21  9:56       ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 10:22       ` [RFC] can fd: backward compatibility for CANFD8 Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D80912.1090700@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.grosjean@peak-system.com \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.