From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCHv2/RFC] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:29:26 +0100 Message-ID: <52D8E9E6.5040507@de.ibm.com> References: <52D7C186.1070700@redhat.com> <1389876260-46636-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <52D7D7A2.2080409@redhat.com> <52D7D95F.5040600@de.ibm.com> <52D7D987.8060305@redhat.com> <20140116185638.GD29522@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140116185638.GD29522@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Gleb Natapov , KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , agraf@suse.de List-ID: On 16/01/14 19:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:07:19PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 16/01/2014 14:06, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: >>> Will you edit the patch description or shall I resend the patch? >> >> I can edit the commit message. >> >> Paolo > > I think we really need to see the effect adding srcu has on interrupt > injection. Michael, do you have a quick way to check if srcu has a noticeable impact on int injection on your systems? I am happy with either v2 or v3 of the patch, but srcu_synchronize_expedited seems to have less latency impact on the full system than rcu_synchronize_expedited. This might give Paolo a hint which of the patches is the right way to go. Christian