From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/26] Migrate more OMAP DMA code to DMA engine Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:53:26 +0530 Message-ID: <52D93CDE.4010101@ti.com> References: <20140102150621.GJ16456@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52CFE494.4010702@ti.com> <20140113141713.GC27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:58583 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750971AbaAQOYC (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:24:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140113141713.GC27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Tony Lindgren , Vinod Koul , sricharan.az@gmail.com On Monday 13 January 2014 07:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:46:20PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >> I tested this series on DRA7 with mmc peripheral dma and it looked >> fine. Some how dmaengine test cases were not fine. But that may not >> have anything to do with this series. I will check more on that and >> will come back with that results as well. > > Not fine in what sense? > Sorry for delayed response. So in the case of dmaengine test case, it looks for channels with DMA_MEMCPY, DMA_XOR, DMA_PQ capabilities. But the omap-dma device is not registered with MEMCPY capabilities, hence the testcase fails as no channels are available. Regards, Sricharan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:53:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH RFC 00/26] Migrate more OMAP DMA code to DMA engine In-Reply-To: <20140113141713.GC27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140102150621.GJ16456@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52CFE494.4010702@ti.com> <20140113141713.GC27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <52D93CDE.4010101@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 13 January 2014 07:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:46:20PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >> I tested this series on DRA7 with mmc peripheral dma and it looked >> fine. Some how dmaengine test cases were not fine. But that may not >> have anything to do with this series. I will check more on that and >> will come back with that results as well. > > Not fine in what sense? > Sorry for delayed response. So in the case of dmaengine test case, it looks for channels with DMA_MEMCPY, DMA_XOR, DMA_PQ capabilities. But the omap-dma device is not registered with MEMCPY capabilities, hence the testcase fails as no channels are available. Regards, Sricharan