All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@minantech.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:03:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D94637.8090602@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D9383F.7040206@redhat.com>

On 17/01/14 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/01/2014 21:22, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> [PATCHv3] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING
>>>
>>> When starting lots of dataplane devices the bootup takes very long
>>> on my s390 system(prototype irqfd code). With larger setups we are even
>>> able to trigger some timeouts in some components.
>>> Turns out that the KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl takes very
>>> long (strace claims up to 0.1 sec) when having multiple CPUs.
>>> This is caused by the  synchronize_rcu and the HZ=100 of s390.
>>>
>>> Lets use the expedited variant to speed things up as suggested by
>>> Michael S. Tsirkin
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  virt/kvm/irqchip.c |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
>>> index 20dc9e4..dbcfde7 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
>>> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>  	kvm_irq_routing_update(kvm, new);
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
>>>  
>>> -	synchronize_rcu();
>>> +	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
>>>  
>>>  	new = old;
>>>  	r = 0;
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> Well... I love to contradict myself, so: no way this can be accepted
> this close to the end of the merge window.  :(
> 
> synchronize_rcu_expedited() forces a context switch on all CPUs, even
> those that are not running KVM.  Thus, this patch might help a guest DoS
> its host by changing the IRQ routing tables in a loop.
> 
> So this will have to wait for 3.15.  We have ~2 months to do performance
> measurements on the v2 patch.  Sorry.

Any chance that you or Michael can give some performance feedback on v2? All
my lab systems are s390 and not x86...

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-17 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  9:23 [PATCH] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-16 12:44   ` [PATCHv2/RFC] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 12:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-16 13:06       ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 13:07         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-16 18:56           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-17  8:29             ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-17  9:19               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-19 22:23               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-21  4:59                 ` Andrew Theurer
2014-01-16 18:55     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-16 20:07       ` [PATCHv3] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 20:22         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-17 14:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-17 15:03             ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2014-01-17 15:26               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-21 17:35     ` [PATCHv2/RFC] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 11:58       ` [PATCHv2] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-02-24 12:02         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D94637.8090602@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@minantech.com \
    --cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.