[U-Boot] [PATCH REPOST4 1/2] ARM: rpi_b: power on SDHCI and USB HW modules

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 01/13/2014 07:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Send RPC commands to the VideoCore to turn on the SDHCI and USB modules.
> For SDHCI this isn't needed in practice, since the firmware already
> turned on the power in order to load U-Boot. However, it's best to be
> explicit. For USB, this is necessary, since the module isn't powered
> otherwise. This will allow the kernel USB driver to work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
> ---
> Could this please be applied for v2014.01? I know I did first post it
> after the merge window closed (by just a few hours...) but there's always
> plenty of other stuff that's accepted under similar timing.

Albert, sorry for responding to the patch rather than your mail, but for
some reason I didn't get your response on Jan 14 where you wrote:

> I'm not against taking this in as this affects only a single board (and
> provided Tom is OK too).

Tom, is this patch OK?

> Also, I'd really like to know whether the three reposts are actually
> versions (in which case I'd have liked a version history, even limited
> to "vN: rebase" if such is the case) or pings (in which case I'd prefer
> "ping?" replies, as these replies do not create patch entries in
> patchwork).

It's the same patch, with no changes. I reposted since there was no
response, so figured it must have been lost.

In other cases where I sent pings in replies to the patch, I was asked
to repost the patch instead. Admittedly the particular case I'm thinking
of here was Linux kernel patches, but the process ought to be the same;
it's hard on submitters to have to remember some table of
maintainer/project -> ping/repost style and similar things:-(