From: Daniel Exner <dex@dragonslave.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Poor network performance x86_64.. also with 3.13
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:27:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DDA2CD.9040001@dragonslave.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DB0439.2060905@dragonslave.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am 18.01.2014 23:46, schrieb Daniel Exner:
> Hi again,
>
> Am 18.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
>> + netdev.
> Thx
>
> Am 18.01.2014 20:49, schrieb Holger Hoffstätte:> [This mail was
> also posted to gmane.linux.kernel.]
>
>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:30:55 +0100, Daniel Exner wrote:
>
>>> I recently upgraded the Kernel from version 3.10 to latest
>>> stable 3.12.8, did the usual "make oldconfig" (resulting
>>> config attached).
>>>
>>> But now I noticed some _really_ low network performance.
>
>> Try: sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_limit_output_bytes=262144
>
> Tried that. Even 10 times the value. Same effect.
I just did the same procedure with Kernel Version 3.13: same poor rates.
I think I will try to see of 3.12.6 was still ok and bisect from there.
Greetings
Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=xCa3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-18 19:30 3.12.8 poor network performance x86_64 Daniel Exner
2014-01-18 19:49 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2014-01-18 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-18 22:46 ` Daniel Exner
2014-01-20 22:27 ` Daniel Exner [this message]
2014-01-20 22:37 ` Poor network performance x86_64.. also with 3.13 Borislav Petkov
2014-01-20 23:27 ` Branimir Maksimovic
2014-02-09 15:05 ` Daniel Exner
2014-02-09 15:05 ` Daniel Exner
2014-02-09 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-09 18:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-02-09 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DDA2CD.9040001@dragonslave.de \
--to=dex@dragonslave.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.