From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:03:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140121165803.GC20798@arm.com>
On 01/21/2014 08:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> BTW, could we not avoid the #if and always use __kernel_long_t? This
> wouldn't break the user ABI.
>
Ah yes, this is the wrong version of the patchset. I already gave that
feedback and H.J. posted an update. My bad.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-27 17:25 [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32 H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 22:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-21 17:03 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-01-21 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] Use __kernel_long_t/__kernel_ulong_t in <linux/resource.h> H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 3/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in uapi struct ipc64_perm H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct msgbuf H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 5/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 6/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds H.J. Lu
2014-01-21 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-21 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
2014-01-22 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-22 15:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 7/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in shmid64_ds/shminfo64/shm_info H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct mq_attr H.J. Lu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-27 22:14 [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32 H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.