From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen-4.4-rc2 - Some Nested Virt testing
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:40:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DFA026.507@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DF9FAA0200007800115B3B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 22/01/14 09:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 21.01.14 at 19:12, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> I have been giving nested virt a try, and have my first bug to report.
>> This is still ongoing, and is by no means complete yet.
>>
>> Setup:
>> Each reference to XenServer is a trunk XenServer based on 4.4-rc2
>>
>> Single Intel Haswell SDP (Grantley platform):
>> Native hypervisor: XenServer
>>
>> Two L1 guests:
>> XenServer (running with EPT)
>> XenServer (running with shadow)
>>
>>
>> When attempting to create an L2 EPT HVM domain under an L1 shadow
>> domain, the L1 shadow domain is killed with:
>>
>> (XEN) <vm_launch_fail> error code 7
> Considering that 7 is "VM entry with invalid control field(s)", I think
> it would be quite helpful if we enhanced the error handling here to
> dump the VMCS.
Agreed. I cannot find any further help from hardware to identify which
control field(s) is(are) invalid, so the best we appear to be able to
know is "At least one of these bits are wrong in the current context".
>
> Also - did you perhaps mean to Cc VMX folks on your original mail?
> Chances that they see your report without doing so are - according
> to my experience - rather slim...
>
> Jan
>
>
I wasn't really thinking that much - I had hoped to also try out
nested-virt on AMD, but have completely run out of time.
After 4.4 gets released, I will try to automate the environment setup,
and start investigating/reporting the encountered issues properly.
Until then sadly, I have more important issues to work on in the meantime.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 18:12 Xen-4.4-rc2 - Some Nested Virt testing Andrew Cooper
2014-01-21 18:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-01-22 9:38 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-22 10:40 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-01-24 14:58 ` George Dunlap
2014-01-24 16:00 ` George Dunlap
2014-01-26 8:29 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-01-27 9:33 ` Tim Deegan
2014-01-27 15:34 ` Zhang, Yang Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DFA026.507@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.