From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52DFD1B0.6070303@xenomai.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:12:00 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <52DF9C5F.70005@geral.com> <52DFAA18.6080703@xenomai.org> <52DFAD29.4000800@geral.com> <52DFB2DE.4050501@xenomai.org> <52DFC734.2090906@geral.com> <52DFC80D.6050101@xenomai.org> <52DFCFDE.9060700@geral.com> In-Reply-To: <52DFCFDE.9060700@geral.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] imx28 rtcan flexcan system freezes List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexandre COFFIGNAL Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 01/22/2014 03:04 PM, Alexandre COFFIGNAL wrote: > > Le 22/01/2014 14:30, Gilles Chanteperdrix a écrit : >> On 01/22/2014 02:27 PM, Alexandre COFFIGNAL wrote: >>> >>> Le 22/01/2014 13:00, Gilles Chanteperdrix a écrit : >>>> On 01/22/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandre COFFIGNAL wrote: >>>>>>> + cf->data[3]=((data0 >> 0) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[2]=((data0 >> 8) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[1]=((data0 >> 16) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[0]=((data0 >> 24) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[7]=((data1 >> 0) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[6]=((data1 >> 8) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[5]=((data1 >> 16) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> + cf->data[4]=((data1 >> 24) & 0xFF) ; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> rtcan flexcan works perfectly. >>>>>>> is anyone know what is the problem with first instructions ? >>>>>> Probably mb->data does not have the right alignment. Could you not >>>>>> arrange to get it properly aligned? Failing that, you should use >>>>>> put_unaligned instead of open coding it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> here structures used in flexcan driver, it seem to be aligned >>>> >>>> I am talking about the alignment of cf->data, since obviously, that is >>>> the one which is causing problems. >>>> >>>> >>> Thank a lot, put_unaligned fix this issue if you want, i can send a path >>> >> >> The other solution (getting cf->data to be properly aligned) would be >> more efficient, why is not it possible to get cf->data properly aligned? >> > I think, i can't get cf->data to be properly aligned because "cf" is > receive internal frame representation within the ring buffer > of a struct rtcan_socket and struct rtcan_rb_frame is a generic > structure used in all rtcan drivers . Well, if you fix rtcan_rb_frame to be aligned, it will be aligned for all drivers, so that looks like a worthwile improvement... -- Gilles.