From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: Remove unnecessary vlan_put_tag in br_handle_vlan
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:22:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DFE253.80003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390350577-4122-1-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 01/21/2014 07:29 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> br_handle_vlan() pushes HW accelerated vlan tag into skbuff when outgoing
> port is the bridge device.
> This is unnecessary because __netif_receive_skb_core() can handle skbs
> with HW accelerated vlan tag. In current implementation,
> __netif_receive_skb_core() needs to extract the vlan tag embedded in skb
> data. This could cause low network performance especially when receiving
> frames at a high frame rate on the bridge device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 21 ---------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index 7ffc801..4ca4d0a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -151,27 +151,6 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_vlan(struct net_bridge *br,
> br_vlan_get_tag(skb, &vid);
> if (test_bit(vid, pv->untagged_bitmap))
> skb = br_vlan_untag(skb);
> - else {
> - /* Egress policy says "send tagged". If output device
> - * is the bridge, we need to add the VLAN header
> - * ourselves since we'll be going through the RX path.
> - * Sending to ports puts the frame on the TX path and
> - * we let dev_hard_start_xmit() add the header.
> - */
> - if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> - pv->port_idx == 0) {
> - /* vlan_put_tag expects skb->data to point to
> - * mac header.
> - */
> - skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> - skb = __vlan_put_tag(skb, skb->vlan_proto, skb->vlan_tci);
> - if (!skb)
> - goto out;
> - /* put skb->data back to where it was */
> - skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> - skb->vlan_tci = 0;
> - }
> - }
>
> out:
> return skb;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 0:29 [PATCH net-next] bridge: Remove unnecessary vlan_put_tag in br_handle_vlan Toshiaki Makita
2014-01-22 15:22 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-01-23 5:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DFE253.80003@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.