From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nv50, nvc0: clear out RT on a null cbuf Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:18:05 +0000 Message-ID: <52E178FD.30509@gmail.com> References: <1389925395-22379-1-git-send-email-imirkin@alum.mit.edu> <52E1701A.3060203@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org To: Ilia Mirkin Cc: "mesa-dev-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org" , "nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org" List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org On 23/01/14 19:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> Ilia, >> > Do you know why we cannot set the rt height to 64? After all you >> > explicitly set the format to NONE. > Because then the RT would have a size, which we don't want. The real > question is why not set the width to 0. It was that way in Christoph's > code, I assumed he did it that way for a reason. > Err. I meant to say "Why do we set the width to 64", which you've already covered. -Emil