From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Proxmox and ceph integration Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: <52E2266C.10904@dachary.org> References: <52E2253C.1060604@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0sfLnIILfufSjOUlRmlLGfrAJsI3eJnOr" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:51755 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752128AbaAXIiH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 03:38:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52E2253C.1060604@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Dietmar Maurer Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0sfLnIILfufSjOUlRmlLGfrAJsI3eJnOr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Dpve-manager.git;a=3Dblob;f=3DPVE/Cep= hTools.pm;h=3Df7f11ce2dc515cfd4fb423dbcf6dbbe4877b8afa;hb=3D3f5368bb67146= d89f7ed098dc0c036c2217ed193 but not I'm not familiar with proxmox :-) On 24/01/2014 09:33, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm told today that the Ceph proxmox integration has recently been impr= oved. I'm curious to take a look, would you be so kind as to point me to = the URL where I could read about it ? >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --0sfLnIILfufSjOUlRmlLGfrAJsI3eJnOr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLiJmwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23ZqwCeNCz81CsyIeU5HZYraA48KdpU B84AoIkitUEGFOoNmdIjPFNjf68sTaPE =VP1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0sfLnIILfufSjOUlRmlLGfrAJsI3eJnOr--