From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1W6k1n-0006ZA-Fn for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:54:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s0OGsNOP012068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:54:23 -0800 Message-ID: <52E29ABF.9040403@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:54:23 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Anyone done long term testing? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org I left an ath10k system up overnight, running 128kbps traffic on each of 32 stations, and by morning, the machine was OOM. Just curious if anyone had done overnight traffic runs with any luck? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k