What's the meaning of CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP?

[mobile.parmenides@gmail.com (parmenides)]

? 2014/1/25 1:27, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:43:35 +0800, parmenides said:
>
>> CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP: should be set in the kernel configuration, but isn't.
>
>> I wonder what the meaning of the configuration is. How does it work? Thx!
>
> Drivers (and all other kernel-mode code, actually) need to do proper locking,
> so that if there's a race between code running on 2 different CPUs at the same
> time, they don't stomp all over each other (consider the case of one CPU trying
> to walk a linked list at the same time that another CPU is deleting an entry
> from the list - this can leave the first CPU walking down a now corrupted list
> following now-stale pointers).
>
> There are a lot of old buggy drivers that don't do proper locking.  In a
> few cases, the drivers are *technically* buggy, but the bugs just happen to
> be in code that will manage to work anyhow *if there is only one CPU* (for
> instance, wrapped in a IRQ-disabled section).  These drivers get BROKEN_ON_SMP
> attached, because they can still potentially be useful for people compiling
> on architectures that only support 1 processor core, or *need* the driver and
> don't care if they only use 1 core of the 4 they have.
>
> The proper fix is, of course, to put proper locking in the driver - but most
> BROKEN_ON_SMP drivers are creeping horrorshows straight out of HP Lovecraft,
> and nobody wants to invest the resources needed to fix the abandonware driver.
>

Does that mean BROKEN_ON_SMP drivers are all tagged, and they are not 
seen when I 'make menuconfig', if CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP not be set? If 
so, how these drivers are tagged?