From: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@enomsg.org,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cw00.choi@samsung.com, Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Deferrable timers support for timerfd API
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:12:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E606D8.6000401@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DEC6A3.9020600@linaro.org>
Dear Thomas,
could you please comment John's question (see bellow) regarding flags.
On 01/21/2014 11:12 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 02:43 AM, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
>> Hello dear community.
>>
>> This is reworked patch set of original Anton's Vorontsov
>> proposal regarding unified deferrable timers in the user space.
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/514707/
>>
>>
>> I decided to resubmit it due we found it usefull for us too.
>>
>> timerfd was modified since Anton's commit, Alarm support was added.
>> This isn't only rebase. Anton's previous version used deferrable timer
>> in couple with hrtimer. This version uses only deferrable timer. It
>> mean the behaviour of overrun number is different.
>> e.g. if you don't poll one second timer for a 10 seconds - you'll get
>> 10 overruns with hrtimer, but for deferrable timer it could be another value.
>>
> Sorry, last week was a little crazy and I didn't get a chance to closely
> review this. But looking at this my major conceptual objection with the
> previous patchset (introducing the new clockid) is gone.
>
> My remaining conceptual concern here is that the TIMER_DEFERRABLE flag
> is a timerfd only construct here, and I worry we should make sure we
> think this through well enough that the same functionality can be
> supported via other timer interfaces (like clock_nanosleep, etc), which
> may mean the functionality should be pushed more deeply into the hrtimer
> subsystem.
>
> So main suggestion here is to make sure you cc Thomas Gleixner on future
> iterations, so he can provide some thoughts on what the best approach
> might be here. I know he also has some plans that might collide with the
> jiffies_to_ktime work.
>
> Thomas: Any thought here? Should we be trying to unify the timerfd flags
> and the posix timer flags (specifically things like TIMER_CANCEL_ON_SET,
> which is currently timerfd-only)? Should a deferrable flag be added to
> the hrtimer core or left to the timer wheel?
>
> thanks
> -john
>
--
Best regards,
Alexey Perevalov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 10:43 [PATCH v2 0/3] Deferrable timers support for timerfd API Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-13 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] kernel/time: Add new helpers to convert ktime to/from jiffies Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-14 0:15 ` Chanwoo Choi
2014-01-13 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] timerfd: Factor out timer-type unspecific timerfd_expire() Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-13 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] timerfd: Add support for deferrable timers Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-13 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Deferrable timers support for timerfd API Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-13 17:36 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <877ga34wd1.fsf-KWJ+5VKanrL29G5dvP0v1laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-14 6:44 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-14 6:44 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-01-21 19:12 ` John Stultz
2014-01-27 7:12 ` Alexey Perevalov [this message]
2014-02-04 16:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-05 6:43 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-05 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-05 22:02 ` John Stultz
2014-02-05 22:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 17:38 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-06 17:47 ` John Stultz
2014-02-06 20:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-07 17:41 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-16 15:20 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-16 15:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-17 14:15 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-18 19:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-18 19:48 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-18 22:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-19 7:08 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-03 6:54 ` Alexey Perevalov
2014-02-03 23:58 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E606D8.6000401@samsung.com \
--to=a.perevalov@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.