From: Sudeep.Holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:11:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E78241.4020502@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001d01cf1bc9$452569d0$cf703d70$%han@samsung.com>
On 28/01/14 01:35, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use num_possible_cpus() instead of direct use of NR_CPUS. Also,
> it fixes the following checkpatch warning.
>
> WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++-----
> arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 1b7617a..09ff7d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> * cpu_logical_map was initialized to INVALID_HWID to
> * avoid matching valid MPIDR values.
> */
> - for (i = 1; (i < cpu) && (i < NR_CPUS); i++) {
> + for (i = 1; (i < cpu) && (i < num_possible_cpus()); i++) {
> if (cpu_logical_map(i) == hwid) {
> pr_err("%s: duplicate cpu reg properties in the DT\n",
> dn->full_name);
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (cpu >= NR_CPUS)
> + if (cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
Have you tested this patch ? IIUC this will not work as cpu_possible mask is
populated completely and correctly only at the end of this function.
> goto next;
>
> if (cpu_read_ops(dn, cpu) != 0)
> @@ -368,9 +368,9 @@ next:
> }
>
> /* sanity check */
> - if (cpu > NR_CPUS)
> + if (cpu > num_possible_cpus())
> pr_warning("no. of cores (%d) greater than configured maximum of %d - clipping\n",
> - cpu, NR_CPUS);
> + cpu, num_possible_cpus());
>
> if (!bootcpu_valid) {
> pr_err("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR, not enabling secondaries\n");
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ next:
> * All the cpus that made it to the cpu_logical_map have been
> * validated so set them as possible cpus.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++)
> if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
> set_cpu_possible(i, true);
This is what I am referring above, where is possible mask set before this.
If it's already populated correctly then we can remove this completely.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 1:35 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS Jingoo Han
2014-01-28 1:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: kernel: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() Jingoo Han
2014-01-28 15:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-29 4:54 ` Jingoo Han
2014-01-29 5:00 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-28 10:11 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-01-29 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E78241.4020502@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.