From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 24553: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:30:47 +0000 Message-ID: <52E7BF17.3050200@eu.citrix.com> References: <1390901845.7753.6.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell Cc: Anthony Perard , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/28/2014 12:29 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 02:16 +0000, xen.org wrote: >>> flight 24553 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] >>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24553/ >>> >>> Failures :-/ but no regressions. >> >> QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION in xen.git is currently set to qemu-xen-4.4.0-rc1 >> and so will require updating to actually pull this new stuff into the >> release. > > OK. But given that the new code is not part of any RCs, should I wait > for the next one? Should we go back to "master"? I guess we should have gone back to "master" after tagging the last RC? -George