From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:24:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E7E7D8.2050605@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw_xs1tUteDrXz21QZB7BFk5p+F5NZ-SpV=CUVjeFwapA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 28.01.2014 18:12, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Well, I often use the hex numbers to look them up and disassemble them
>> in a vmlinux via gdb and 'list *0x1234123412341234' - where the
>> vmlinux has no debuginfo. (Debuginfo takes longer to build so I
>> generally build without it.)
>
> Why the heck wouldn't you do that? Just do
>
> list schedule+0x45
>
> instead.
Hmm, my gdb does not like that notion.
(gdb) list schedule+0x45
Function "schedule+0x45" not defined.
It thinks +0x45 is part of the function name, adding spaces also does not help.
Or am I doing something very stupid?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 16:47 [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14 H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-20 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-20 23:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-20 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-20 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 14:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 14:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 18:37 ` Kees Cook
2014-01-21 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 13:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 14:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 14:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-21 14:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 5:18 ` Kees Cook
2014-01-23 9:39 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-26 10:16 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-27 5:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-27 6:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-27 6:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-27 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-27 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-27 7:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-30 22:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-31 16:57 ` Kees Cook
2014-02-07 14:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-07 16:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-07 16:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-07 16:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-07 23:16 ` Dave Young
2014-02-07 23:16 ` Dave Young
2014-02-07 23:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-07 23:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-07 23:28 ` Dave Young
2014-02-07 23:28 ` Dave Young
2014-02-07 19:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-07 19:44 ` Kees Cook
2014-02-07 19:44 ` Kees Cook
2014-01-27 6:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-27 7:34 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-27 17:05 ` Kees Cook
2014-01-27 17:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-27 17:24 ` Kees Cook
2014-01-28 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 8:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-28 15:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-28 16:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-28 16:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-28 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 17:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 17:24 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2014-01-28 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 17:52 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-28 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 18:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-28 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 20:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 20:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-28 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-28 20:28 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-01-28 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-29 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-29 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-28 20:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-28 23:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-28 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2014-01-29 6:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-29 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-29 8:27 ` Mathias Krause
2014-01-30 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-30 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E7E7D8.2050605@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=dinggnu@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=md@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.