From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52E90D65.9030200@tycho.nsa.gov> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:17:09 -0500 From: Stephen Smalley MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Moore , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, mthode@mthode.org Subject: Re: file access causes a kernel bug References: <52E8B5F8.2070005@mthode.org> <52E8B7C1.1000101@mthode.org> <1621615.vHn06J0duj@sifl> <52E90B32.5010404@tycho.nsa.gov> In-Reply-To: <52E90B32.5010404@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: "Security-Enhanced Linux \(SELinux\) mailing list" List-Post: List-Help: On 01/29/2014 09:07 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On 01/29/2014 08:55 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 02:11:45 AM Matthew Thode wrote: >>> On 01/29/2014 02:04 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: >>>> This happens consistantly, just ls a particular dir and wheeeeee. >>>> >>>> [ 473.893141] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>>> [ 473.962110] kernel BUG at security/selinux/ss/services.c:654! >>>> [ 473.995314] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP >>>> [ 474.027196] Modules linked in: >>>> [ 474.058118] CPU: 0 PID: 8138 Comm: ls Tainted: G D I >>>> 3.13.0-grsec #1 >>>> [ 474.116637] Hardware name: Supermicro X8ST3/X8ST3, BIOS 2.0 >>>> 07/29/10 >>>> [ 474.149768] task: ffff8805f50cd010 ti: ffff8805f50cd488 task.ti: >>>> ffff8805f50cd488 >>>> [ 474.183707] RIP: 0010:[] [] >>>> context_struct_compute_av+0xce/0x308 >>>> [ 474.219954] RSP: 0018:ffff8805c0ac3c38 EFLAGS: 00010246 >>>> [ 474.252253] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8805c0ac3d94 RCX: >>>> 0000000000000100 >>>> [ 474.287018] RDX: ffff8805e8aac000 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: >>>> ffff8805e8aaa000 >>>> [ 474.321199] RBP: ffff8805c0ac3cb8 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: >>>> 0000000000000006 >>>> [ 474.357446] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8805c567a000 R12: >>>> 0000000000000006 >>>> [ 474.419191] R13: ffff8805c2b74e88 R14: 00000000000001da R15: >>>> 0000000000000000 >>>> [ 474.453816] FS: 00007f2e75220800(0000) GS:ffff88061fc00000(0000) >>>> knlGS:0000000000000000 >>>> [ 474.489254] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>>> [ 474.522215] CR2: 00007f2e74716090 CR3: 00000005c085e000 CR4: >>>> 00000000000207f0 >>>> [ 474.556058] Stack: >>>> [ 474.584325] ffff8805c0ac3c98 ffffffff811b549b ffff8805c0ac3c98 >>>> ffff8805f1190a40 >>>> [ 474.618913] ffff8805a6202f08 ffff8805c2b74e88 00068800d0464990 >>>> ffff8805e8aac860 >>>> [ 474.653955] ffff8805c0ac3cb8 000700068113833a ffff880606c75060 >>>> ffff8805c0ac3d94 >>>> [ 474.690461] Call Trace: >>>> [ 474.723779] [] ? lookup_fast+0x1cd/0x22a >>>> [ 474.778049] [] security_compute_av+0xf4/0x20b >>>> [ 474.811398] [] avc_compute_av+0x2a/0x179 >>>> [ 474.843813] [] avc_has_perm+0x45/0xf4 >>>> [ 474.875694] [] inode_has_perm+0x2a/0x31 >>>> [ 474.907370] [] selinux_inode_getattr+0x3c/0x3e >>>> [ 474.938726] [] security_inode_getattr+0x1b/0x22 >>>> [ 474.970036] [] vfs_getattr+0x19/0x2d >>>> [ 475.000618] [] vfs_fstatat+0x54/0x91 >>>> [ 475.030402] [] vfs_lstat+0x19/0x1b >>>> [ 475.061097] [] SyS_newlstat+0x15/0x30 >>>> [ 475.094595] [] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xa1/0xc3 >>>> [ 475.148405] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>>> [ 475.179201] Code: 00 48 85 c0 48 89 45 b8 75 02 0f 0b 48 8b 45 a0 48 >>>> 8b 3d 45 d0 b6 00 8b 40 08 89 c6 ff ce e8 d1 b0 06 00 48 85 c0 49 89 c7 >>>> 75 02 <0f> 0b 48 8b 45 b8 4c 8b 28 eb 1e 49 8d 7d 08 be 80 01 00 00 e8 >>>> [ 475.255884] RIP [] >>>> context_struct_compute_av+0xce/0x308 >>>> [ 475.296120] RSP >>>> [ 475.328734] ---[ end trace f076482e9d754adc ]--- >>>> >>> >>> sorry, forgot to add, this is for 3.13.0 as well. >>> >>> ls ./.config/ipython/profile_default/ >>> Segmentation fault >> >> Thanks for passing this along, but can you elaborate a bit more on this? >> Distribution? Kernel package? SELinux policy? Any unusual configuration? >> etc. >> >> I ask because I'm not seeing this problem on my system and it seems like a >> fairly basic thing to be broken; if there was an issue with 'ls' on 3.13 I >> expect we would be flooded with angry users right now ... > > Does it happen on any filesystem other than ZFS? > > Do you have any prior SELinux output leading up to this bug? Also, what policy are you using and what is the security context on that file?