From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52E9235C.7090204@geral.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:50:52 +0100 From: Alexandre COFFIGNAL MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <52DF9C5F.70005@geral.com> <52DFAA18.6080703@xenomai.org> <52DFAD29.4000800@geral.com> <52DFB2DE.4050501@xenomai.org> <52DFC734.2090906@geral.com> <52DFC80D.6050101@xenomai.org> <52DFCFDE.9060700@geral.com> <52DFD1B0.6070303@xenomai.org> <52E5616F.90002@grandegger.com> <52E56221.5070005@xenomai.org> <52E56D0F.2040909@grandegger.com> <52E5766A.1040306@xenomai.org> <701f63f992829713e3d3d6b872165208@grandegger.com> <52E829FE.5040106@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] imx28 rtcan flexcan system freezes List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Le 29/01/2014 08:16, Wolfgang Grandegger a écrit : > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:06:54 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix > wrote: >> On 01/27/2014 08:56 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:56:10 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix >>>> IMO, it is not just for the flexcan driver, it will avoid unaligned >>>> accesses for all drivers which access data 4 bytes at a time. And I do >>>> not think it "breaks" anything. What I do not know is: >>> >>> >>> But it's just the Flexcan driver which is doing unaligned accesses. >> Ok, can we agree on the following patch then? >> >> diff --git a/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_flexcan.c >> b/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_flexcan.c >> index 8f0e8d1..1674b73 100644 >> --- a/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_flexcan.c >> +++ b/ksrc/drivers/can/rtcan_flexcan.c >> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ >> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3,5,0) >> #include >> #endif >> +#include >> >> #include >> >> @@ -497,11 +498,9 @@ static void flexcan_rx_interrupt(struct > rtcan_device >> *dev, >> cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG; >> skb->rb_frame_size = EMPTY_RB_FRAME_SIZE; >> } else { >> - skb->rb_frame_size = EMPTY_RB_FRAME_SIZE + cf->can_dlc ; >> - *(__be32 *)(cf->data + 0) = >> - cpu_to_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[0])); >> - *(__be32 *)(cf->data + 4) = >> - cpu_to_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[1])); >> + skb->rb_frame_size = EMPTY_RB_FRAME_SIZE + cf->can_dlc; >> + put_unaligned_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[0]), cf->data + 0); >> + put_unaligned_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[1]), cf->data + 4); >> } >> >> /* Store the interface index */ > D'accord, thanks. > > Wolfgang. > Thank you all for your replies Alexandre.