From: Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, leonardo.lists@gmail.com
Cc: autofs <autofs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: autofs linux 3.8.13 and "Too many levels of symbolic links"
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EA2963.9070709@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391041164.2620.10.camel@perseus.fritz.box>
Thanks, Leonardo and Ian.
In contrast to what Leonardo described, in our case the problem doesn't
go away after some time. If the daemon is restarted and able to unmount
the automount root ( /scratch here) than everything looks fine after the
restart (however, the visible problem might just be (lazy?) unmounted
away ?).
Sadly, I am not able to reproduce it at will. The problem occurs rarely:
We have about 12 active (and 24 most-of-the-time idle) machines running
this code since mid December and had about 8 of theses issues. Of these,
three were on one workstation and two were on another one, so there is a
dependency on the hardware or usage pattern which is not yet identified.
We have very active machines which mount and unmount a lot more then
these two and didn't have an issue.
I know its an old kernel. Sure, latest and greatest first is the
systematic way to go, but I thought, I'd ask for ideas first, because
the kernel upgrade will take much time and work (legacy graphic cards,
netfilter functionality...) and surely will bring new bugs and problems
as well. It always did.
I hoped to get autofs running cleanly before that. There isn't so much
change in "git log -p v3.8.13..master fs/autofs4" anyway.
The logs I currently have are loglevel 1 only and there is nothing
unusual logged. I can change the loglevel to 9 on the currently hung
system but there are now messages when the directory is accessed.
I forgot to dump the autofs_info and autofs_sb_info struct the last
time. Here they are just for completeness:
http://owww.molgen.mpg.de/~buczek/autofs-demo/typescript_2.l
Oh yes, another info: We've seen this on various automount maps with
various nfs-servers, so it doesn't depend on that.
And we rebuild the maps and kill -HUP the daemon a lot.
I plan to go the long way to 3.13 now and let you know if I have any new
information.
Thanks again
Donald
On 01/30/14 01:19, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 17:02 +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are trying to switch from amd to autofs. After successfully testing
>> and rolling it out to the first several machines, from time to time we
>> get directories stuck with "Too many levels of symbolic links" on a path
>> which should be automounted via an indirect map.
>>
>> linux 3.8.13
> What is linux 3.8.13?
> Oh right, an old kernel.
> You need to reproduce this with a current kernel, 3.13.0 for example.
> OTOH I have had a couple of recent reports of this, not including
> Leonardo's, so any information is useful.
>
>> autofs 5.0.8
>>
>> As an example, here is data from a system where the path /scratch/tmp is
>> stuck:
>>
>> http://www.molgen.mpg.de/~buczek/autofs-demo/
>>
>> auto.master # master map
>> auto.scratch # indirect map for /scratch
>> autofs # from /etc/defaults
>> typescript # shows the problem and a bit of gdb dump of kernel
>> structures
>> typescript.l # same with line numbers for reference
>> gdb-macros # macros used in the gdb session
>>
>> From typescript.l , line 122ff it is clear, that /scratch/tmp is not
>> currently mounted. On the other hand, the gdb session finds the dentry
>> of /scratch/tmp which has d_flags 0x70080 (line 99,120). This is
>> DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT+DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT+DCACHE_MOUNTED+DCACHE_RCUACCESS
>> with DCACHE_MOUNTED indicating that there should be something mounted
>> there(?). I think, this state is faulty and necessarily leads to ELOOP
>> during path walk. Probably the situation is known by the gurus here?
> Well, at least I believe there's a bug to be found now.
>
> From this output it does show a dentry that, according to the config,
> shouldn't exist (but might still), is fully visible and claims it's
> mounted (and definitely should be).
>
>> Is there any known bug which can lead to this situation? Any advice?
> Any more information you gather would be good.
> How frequently does this occur?
> Any idea of the activity leading to this?
> A full debug log and a time the mount was discovered inoperable might
> help.
>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Donald
>>
>
--
Donald Buczek
buczek@molgen.mpg.de
Tel: +49 30 8413 1433
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-29 16:02 autofs linux 3.8.13 and "Too many levels of symbolic links" Donald Buczek
2014-01-29 17:16 ` Leonardo Chiquitto
2014-01-30 0:19 ` Ian Kent
2014-01-30 10:28 ` Donald Buczek [this message]
2014-01-30 14:30 ` Ian Kent
2014-01-31 1:36 ` Ian Kent
2014-01-31 3:31 ` Ian Kent
2014-01-31 5:13 ` Ian Kent
2014-01-31 10:10 ` Donald Buczek
2014-01-31 10:29 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-19 10:17 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-19 10:21 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-20 11:41 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-20 12:18 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-20 15:57 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-21 1:42 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-21 15:15 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-28 12:12 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-28 13:29 ` Alexander Viro
2014-02-28 20:35 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-01 21:56 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 0:52 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 2:17 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 8:28 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 9:41 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 10:22 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 11:03 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 11:15 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 11:30 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 11:35 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 11:25 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 2:22 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 7:10 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-02 14:55 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-02 18:51 ` Donald Buczek
2014-03-03 2:40 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-03 2:40 ` Ian Kent
2014-03-04 6:06 ` Ian Kent
2016-03-09 17:44 ` Donald Buczek
2016-03-16 1:32 ` Ian Kent
2016-03-16 1:58 ` Ian Kent
2016-03-16 2:10 ` Ian Kent
2016-05-20 14:12 ` Donald Buczek
2016-05-23 1:53 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-01 1:47 ` autofs linux 3.8.13 and " Ian Kent
2014-02-01 3:32 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-01 13:08 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-01 2:57 ` Ian Kent
2014-02-01 13:01 ` Donald Buczek
2014-02-02 3:45 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EA2963.9070709@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=buczek@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leonardo.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.