From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54929)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1W8zQt-0004uS-GL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:46:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1W8zQn-0001Ly-HW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:45:59 -0500
Received: from smtp.mail.uni-mannheim.de ([134.155.96.80]:50319)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1W8zQn-0001LN-Ay
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:45:53 -0500
Message-ID: <52EAC80A.9010204@weilnetz.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 22:45:46 +0100
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1389893719-16336-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<CAFEAcA9ANB2FSTVQgcQLw=O3w4PbnE0XdtvQUzDQbgs8aO3n4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9ANB2FSTVQgcQLw=O3w4PbnE0XdtvQUzDQbgs8aO3n4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Signed pull requests (was: Re: [PULL 00/11] Trivial
 patches for 2014-01-16)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Am 30.01.2014 15:33, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 16 January 2014 17:35, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>> There's nothing exciting in there, but we have some small bugfixes here and
>> there, and a few cosmetic changes too.
>>
>> This is my first signed pull request too, based on my regular GnuPG key which
>> I use to sign Debian packages.
>>
>> Please pull.
> Thanks, applied. You'll see that gpg is a bit alarmist in
> the merge commit message because we don't have a strong enough
> web of trust between us yet (see also commit 4cddc7f44 for
> earlier instances of that in our history).
>
> thanks
> -- PMM

Never mind. Up to now, only Andreas' and Michael's signatures were
checked by gpg, and neither of these two were trusted. :-)

If you look for the output of "git log | grep gpg:", you'll see that in
the remaining 68 cases, gpg did not find the public keys (which normally
are available from public key servers).

My own signature should also be available from public key servers, and
it is also signed by CAcert. We can exchange more information via
private e-mail if needed for the web of trust.

Regards
Stefan