From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52EBAFB4.6000508@xenomai.org> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:14:12 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <52EBA6D0.2010208@siemens.com> <52EBAAC3.7090105@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <52EBAAC3.7090105@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] forge/cobalt: Do we need to wrap all POSIX calls for non-POSIX skins? List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix , Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai On 01/31/2014 02:53 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/31/2014 02:36 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> was asked why, e.g., xeno-config --skin=alchemy --ldflags returns >> -Wl,@/data/xenomai-forge/inst64/lib/cobalt.wrappers. Is there a >> technical reason? On first glance and after minimal testing, it seems >> not. > > Maybe we could drop xeno-config entirely, and move to pkg-config? This > forces users which develop for Xenomai to have pkg-config installed, but > who does not have it these days? > > xeno-config is sometimes used on the target as well, for retrieving installation parameters. -- Philippe.