Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>]

On 02/02/14 18:52, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 02/02/14 11:29, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch is breaking Linux compilation on ARM:
>>
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c: In function ‘__gnttab_map_refs’:
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c:989:3: error: implicit declaration of
>> function ‘FOREIGN_FRAME’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>     if (unlikely(!set_phys_to_machine(pfn, FOREIGN_FRAME(mfn)))) {
>>     ^
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c: In function ‘__gnttab_unmap_refs’:
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c:1054:3: error: implicit declaration of
>> function ‘get_phys_to_machine’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>     mfn = get_phys_to_machine(pfn);
>>     ^
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c:1055:43: error: ‘FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT’
>> undeclared (first use in this function)
>>     if (mfn == INVALID_P2M_ENTRY || !(mfn & FOREIGN_FRAME_BIT)) {
>>                                             ^
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c:1055:43: note: each undeclared identifier is
>> reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c:1068:9: error: too many arguments to
>> function ‘m2p_remove_override’
>>           mfn);
>>           ^
>> In file included from include/xen/page.h:4:0,
>>                   from drivers/xen/grant-table.c:48:
>> /local/home/julien/works/midway/linux/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h:106:19:
>> note: declared here
>>   static inline int m2p_remove_override(struct page *page, bool
>> clear_pte)
>>                     ^
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Hi,
> 
> That's bad indeed. I think the best solution is to put those parts
> behind an #ifdef x86. The ones moved from x86/p2m.c to grant-table.c.
> David, Stefano, what do you think?

I don't think we want (more) #ifdef CONFIG_X86 in grant-table.c and the
arch-specific bits will have to factored out into their own functions
with suitable stubs provided for ARM.

But, this patch went in late and it's clearly not ready. So I think it
should be reverted and we should aim to get it sorted out for 3.15.

Konrad/Stefano (if you agree) please revert
08ece5bb2312b4510b161a6ef6682f37f4eac8a1 and send a pull request.

Konrad, I also think you should look at adding an ARM build to your test
system (I thought you had this already).

David