From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.12]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FE0E0059A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 03:04:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail111-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.226) by VA3EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.7.40.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:12 +0000 Received: from mail111-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail111-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815CD26008D; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: VS-5(zzbb2dI98dI9371I936eI1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz1de098h17326ah8275bh1de097h186068hz2dh2a8h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh2222h224fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh22d0h2336h2438h2461h2487h24ach24d7h2516h1155h) Received: from mail111-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail111-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1391425449895213_25604; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS041.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.253]) by mail111-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D485D420047; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by VA3EHSMHS041.bigfish.com (10.7.99.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:09 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.2; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:04:09 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.15] ([10.29.244.15]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id s13B46Ej018469; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 04:04:07 -0700 Message-ID: <52EF7662.2030400@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:58:42 -0200 From: Daiane Angolini Organization: Freescale Semiconductor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Hill , Otavio Salvador References: <52D59C91.8090802@Oracle.com> <236451bb90b4484c82efde5489a7dbde@BY2PR03MB144.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <52EACA3C.8090701@Oracle.com> <52EC19F2.30605@Oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <52EC19F2.30605@Oracle.com> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: fsl framebuffer image ? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:04:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31-01-2014 19:47, David Hill wrote: > > Thanks Otavio, > I see now that I picked the wrong machine type for the SDP in this > build, which now make clear to me why I had a failure building u-boot. > Unfortunately I don't need to do a lot of this so it is easy to stumble > on which board is which. > > My need is for fsl-image-fb (or something close to it). Any recent > kernel will do as long as I can get the accelerated framebuffer > rendering stuff with a handful of other useful items like sshd. You could copy only the fsl-image-fb image file, for your first tests. But, the piece of code you need is: DISTRO_FEATURES_remove = "x11 wayland" x11 and wayland are the default DISTRO_FEATURES backend, if you remove both, you have framebuffer. Daiane > > We have several different boards in my group, Freescale and Boundry and > maybe even a Wandboard, so I would really prefer not to use the > meta-fsl-bsp-release if there is an easier, mainline way that I can > understand. (And I guess follow directions). > > Any suggestions as to how I should proceed with to get accelerated fb > support with fsl-community-bsp other than the earlier suggestion of > qt4e-demo-image? > > I really wish that fsl-image-x11 just contained the two needed GL > libraries with different postfixes like it used to. (libEGL-fb.so) I > don't care about the image size because I am not distributing it. > > thanks, > Dave > > > On 1/31/14, Jan 31, 11:11 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Hello David, >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:55 PM, David Hill >> wrote: >>> On 1/14/14, Jan 14, 9:25 PM, Lauren Post wrote: >>>> You can use the one in our meta-fsl-bsp-release layer. There is one >>>> being >>>> reviewed based on the one Freescale released in the >>>> meta-fsl-bsp-release >>>> layer. Our current 3.10.17-1.0.0 beta has support for all the >>>> graphical >>>> backends including the related image recipes for each backend. >>>> >>>> Get meta-fsl-release-layer from git.freescale.com. >>> >>> >>> Hi Lauren, >>> could I trouble you for a quick question ? I am getting a build >>> failure >>> and have not a clue how to proceed. >>> >>> meta-fsl-bsp-release & git checkout origin/dora_3.10.17-1.0.0_beta >>> >>> MACHINE=imx6qsabrelite >>> bitbake fsl-iamge-fb >> ... >> >> Personally I don't use the meta-fsl-bsp-release layer as it's not a >> community layer, and we cannot contribute back patches and fixes to >> it. >> >> The release layer is the official way Freescale is using to release >> its new source code on top of meta-fsl-arm. The supported board list >> is limited and is usually available in its release notes. But I don't >> believe sabrelite is supported, as it's not a board from Freescale. >> >> I recommend you to use the fsl-community-bsp as is as sabrelite is >> properly supported in there by Boundary Devices. You can see a blog >> post[1] about how to build an image for Nitrogen6x (which works for >> sabrelite board too). Just change "dylan" to "dora", the latest stable >> release. >> >> If you need kernel 3.10.17 you can have an early snapshot on >> master-next, although it's a work in progress, so far. >> >> 1. >> http://www.ossystems.com.br/blog/2013/04/15/yocto-with-boundary-devices-nitrogen6x-5-steps-only.html >> >> >> Regards, >> > > -- Daiane