All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com,
	dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	jun.nakajima@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:56:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F10DB4.9070407@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F0DF430200007800118F76@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 02/04/2014 06:38 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 21.01.14 at 20:08, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Save VPMU state during context switch for both HVM and PV guests unless we
>> are in PMU privileged mode (i.e. dom0 is doing all profiling) and the
>> switched
>> out domain is not the control domain. The latter condition is needed because
>> me may have just turned the privileged PMU mode on and thus need to save
>> last domain.
> While this is understandable, ...
>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -1444,17 +1444,16 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct vcpu *next)
>>       }
>>   
>>       if (prev != next)
>> -        update_runstate_area(prev);
>> -
>> -    if ( is_hvm_vcpu(prev) )
>>       {
>> -        if (prev != next)
>> +        update_runstate_area(prev);
>> +        if ( !(vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_PRIV) ||
>> +             !is_control_domain(prev->domain) )
>>               vpmu_save(prev);
> ... I'd really like you to investigate ways to achieve the same effect
> without this extra second condition added to the context switch path.
> E.g. by synchronously issuing a save on all affected vCPU-s when
> privileged mode gets turned on.

Yes, I should do something like that.

-boris

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-21 19:08 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 14:16   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] x86/VPMU: Stop AMD counters when called from vpmu_save_force() Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] x86/VPMU: Minor VPMU cleanup Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 14:28   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 14:54   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-24 16:49     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 16:57       ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 14:59   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-24 15:10   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-24 17:13     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-27  8:34       ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-27 15:20         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-27 15:29           ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-31 16:58   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:14   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:07     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:22   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:26     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 15:50       ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:31   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:53     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 16:01       ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:13         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 16:39           ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:38   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:56     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-01-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:48   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:31     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 16:41       ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:50         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] x86/VPMU: Suport for PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-04 11:51   ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:44     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F10DB4.9070407@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.