All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Weird sched_clock behaviour during boot with -rc1
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:46:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F1518B.9010109@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140204183641.GA25127@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

On 02/04/2014 10:36 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Booting -rc1 on my TC2 gives the following strange entries in the dmesg:
>
>
>   Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
>   [    0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
>
>   [...]
>
>   [    0.000000]   HighMem zone: 329728 pages, LIFO batch:31
>   [    7.789662] sched_clock: 32 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 178956969942ns
>   [    0.000129] PERCPU: Embedded 9 pages/cpu @ee7bd000 s12800 r8192 d15872 u36864
>
>   [...]
>
>   [    0.868297] NR_IRQS:16 nr_irqs:16 16
>   [    0.886350] Architected cp15 timer(s) running at 24.00MHz (phys).
>   [ 2915.164998] sched_clock: 56 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 2863311519744ns
>   [    0.000002] Switching to timer-based delay loop
>   [    0.014249] Console: colour dummy device 80x30
>
>
> so it looks like something whacky goes on during sched_clock registration.
> Sure enough, we're doing a pr_info in-between updating cs.* and calling
> update_sched_clock(), so moving the print sorts things out (diff below).

Yea... we have to be particularly careful with sched_clock to avoid
locks since we don't want to deadlock, but in this case
sched_clock_register is a little too relaxed here.

Stephen: Would it make sense to set cd.suspended = true at the top of
the registration? That should block any sched_clock calls from getting
half-updated data, but still allow the sched_clock_update function to work.


> What I can't figure out is why this has suddenly started happening with
> 3.14. Any ideas?

No clue. I'm guessing something like timing changes in the printk paths
that call sched_clock?

I suspect your patch to move the print down will also be a good idea
along with the suspending sched_clock while we register new ones.

thanks
-john

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-04 18:36 Weird sched_clock behaviour during boot with -rc1 Will Deacon
2014-02-04 20:46 ` John Stultz [this message]
2014-02-04 22:00   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-02-05 21:47     ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-07 18:23     ` John Stultz
2014-02-07 19:37       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-02-07 20:48       ` [PATCH] sched_clock: Prevent callers from seeing half-updated data Stephen Boyd
2014-02-07 22:22         ` Stephen Boyd
2014-02-07 22:28           ` John Stultz
2014-02-11  6:49             ` Stephen Boyd
2014-02-17 18:13               ` John Stultz
2014-02-07 22:28         ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Boyd
2014-02-10 11:14           ` Will Deacon
2014-02-17 11:19             ` Will Deacon
2014-02-17 18:04               ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F1518B.9010109@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.